Botswana vs Namibia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Botswana
73.74 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
420.69 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
158th
Namibia rank
157th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Namibia
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 420.69 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 73.74 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 346.95 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 5.7 times Botswana's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 158th and Namibia ranks 157th of 158 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 71.33 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 182.98 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 111.65 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 102.11 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 206.75 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 104.64 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 92.29 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 224.5 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 132.21 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 50.3 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 259.27 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 208.98 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 40.62 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 343.99 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 303.37 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 52.61 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 375.17 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 322.56 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 134.69 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 403.52 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 268.83 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Botswana or Namibia?
Namibia, at 420.69 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 73.74 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Botswana and Namibia?
346.95 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Namibia rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 158th and Namibia ranks 157th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Namibia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/botswana/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/botswana/namibia/">Botswana vs Namibia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.