Bhutan vs New Caledonia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Bhutan
5,680 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
5,490 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
143rd
New Caledonia rank
144th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • New Caledonia
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 5,680 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 5,490 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 190 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Bhutan ranks 143rd and New Caledonia ranks 144th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 3,613 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,010 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,397 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 4,462 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 7,023 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,560 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 5,941 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,118 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,177 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 6,981 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,786 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,195 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 6,797 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,365 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,432 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 8,102 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,127 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,974 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 6,671 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,618 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,053 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Bhutan or New Caledonia?
Bhutan, at 5,680 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 5,490 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Bhutan and New Caledonia?
190 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and New Caledonia rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 143rd and New Caledonia ranks 144th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs New Caledonia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/new-caledonia/">Bhutan vs New Caledonia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.