Bangladesh vs Malta: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Bangladesh
247,101 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
268,447 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
11th
Malta rank
9th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Malta
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 268,447 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 247,101 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 21,346 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 11th and Malta ranks 9th of 158 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 49,311 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 256,796 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 207,484 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
1970s 55,121 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 329,366 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 274,246 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 67,031 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 381,335 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 314,304 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 81,035 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 494,695 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 413,660 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 117,237 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 478,807 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 361,570 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 178,921 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 394,755 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 215,834 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 233,615 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 276,271 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 42,656 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Malta?
Malta, at 268,447 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 247,101 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Malta?
21,346 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Malta rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 11th and Malta ranks 9th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Malta: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/malta/">Bangladesh vs Malta: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.