Australia vs Mali: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Australia
5,988 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
7,379 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
140th
Mali rank
138th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Mali
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 7,379 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 5,988 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 1,391 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 140th and Mali ranks 138th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Mali in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 2,208 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,062 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,146 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 2,692 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,208 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,483 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 3,045 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,634 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,410 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 3,857 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,416 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,441 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 4,246 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,408 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 838.26 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 4,897 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,254 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 357.13 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Mali
2020s 5,850 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 7,033 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,183 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Australia or Mali?
Mali, at 7,379 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 5,988 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Australia and Mali?
1,391 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mali?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Mali rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 140th and Mali ranks 138th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Mali: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/australia/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/australia/mali/">Australia vs Mali: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.