Australia vs Bhutan: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Australia
5,988 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan
5,680 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
140th
Bhutan rank
143rd

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Bhutan
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 5,988 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 5,680 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 308 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Australia ranks 140th and Bhutan ranks 143rd of 158 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Bhutan Difference Ahead
1960s 2,208 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,613 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,405 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 2,692 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,462 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,771 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 3,045 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,941 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,897 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 3,857 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,981 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,124 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 4,246 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,797 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,551 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 4,897 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,102 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,205 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 5,850 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,671 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 820.91 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Australia or Bhutan?
Australia, at 5,988 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 5,680 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Australia and Bhutan?
308 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bhutan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Bhutan rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 140th and Bhutan ranks 143rd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Bhutan: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/australia/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/australia/bhutan/">Australia vs Bhutan: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.