Argentina vs Chile: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Argentina
19,914 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
21,037 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
107th
Chile rank
106th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Chile
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 21,037 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 19,914 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 1,123 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 107th and Chile ranks 106th of 158 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 9,358 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,102 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,256 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 10,526 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 6,921 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,605 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 11,781 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,674 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,107 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 13,698 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 12,925 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 773.27 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 17,301 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 17,185 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 116.18 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 20,868 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 19,990 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 877.83 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 22,240 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 21,008 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,231 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Argentina or Chile?
Chile, at 21,037 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 19,914 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Argentina and Chile?
1,123 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Chile rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 107th and Chile ranks 106th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Chile: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/argentina/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/argentina/chile/">Argentina vs Chile: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.