Angola vs Canada: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Angola
5,890 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
5,486 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
142nd
Canada rank
145th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Angola
  • Canada
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 5,890 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 5,486 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 404 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Angola ranks 142nd and Canada ranks 145th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Canada in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 697.36 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,196 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,499 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Canada
1970s 702.46 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,561 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,859 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Canada
1980s 562.98 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,982 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,419 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Canada
1990s 768.61 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,439 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,671 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Canada
2000s 2,260 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,005 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,744 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Canada
2010s 4,477 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,785 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 307.29 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Canada
2020s 5,472 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,370 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 101.55 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Angola or Canada?
Angola, at 5,890 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 5,486 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Angola and Canada?
404 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Canada rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Angola ranks 142nd and Canada ranks 145th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Canada: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/angola/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/angola/canada/">Angola vs Canada: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.