Angola vs Australia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Angola
5,890 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia
5,988 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
142nd
Australia rank
140th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Angola
  • Australia
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 5,988 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 5,890 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 98 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Angola ranks 142nd and Australia ranks 140th of 158 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Australia Difference Ahead
1960s 697.36 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,208 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,510 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 702.46 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,692 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,989 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 562.98 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,045 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 2,482 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 768.61 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,857 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 3,088 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 2,260 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,246 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,986 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 4,477 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,897 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 419.28 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 5,472 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 5,850 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 378.3 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Angola or Australia?
Australia, at 5,988 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 5,890 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Angola and Australia?
98 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Australia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Australia rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Angola ranks 142nd and Australia ranks 140th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Australia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/angola/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/angola/australia/">Angola vs Australia: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.