What is the difference in agricultural land use, per unit of gdp between Portugal and United States?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with United States ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and United States?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Portugal vs United States: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP

Portugal

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2023

United States

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Portugal rank

149th

United States rank

146th

Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP over time

Portugal
United States

How they compare

United States currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Portugal, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes United States's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 149th and United States ranks 146th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 2 and United States in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Portugal	United States	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1970s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	United States
1980s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1990s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	United States
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	United States
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	United States
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land use, per unit of gdp, Portugal or United States?: United States, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land use, per unit of gdp between Portugal and United States?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and United States?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Portugal and United States rank globally for agricultural land use, per unit of gdp?: Portugal ranks 149th and United States ranks 146th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs United States: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-unit-of-gdp/portugal/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-unit-of-gdp/portugal/united-states/">Portugal vs United States: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,782 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.