What is the difference in agricultural land use, per unit of gdp between Cote d'Ivoire and Togo?

0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Togo ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Togo?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cote d'Ivoire vs Togo: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP

Cote d'Ivoire

0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Togo

0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Cote d'Ivoire rank

39th

Togo rank

37th

Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP over time

Cote d'Ivoire
Togo

How they compare

Togo currently reports 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.2 times Cote d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 39th and Togo ranks 37th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cote d'Ivoire	Togo	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0179 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0122 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0056 hectares per US$ of GDP	Cote d'Ivoire
1970s	0.0057 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0045 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0012 hectares per US$ of GDP	Cote d'Ivoire
1980s	0.0021 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0023 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Togo
1990s	0.0015 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0016 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Togo
2000s	0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0012 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	Togo
2010s	0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Togo
2020s	0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land use, per unit of gdp, Cote d'Ivoire or Togo?: Togo, at 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land use, per unit of gdp between Cote d'Ivoire and Togo?: 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Togo?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Togo rank globally for agricultural land use, per unit of gdp?: Cote d'Ivoire ranks 39th and Togo ranks 37th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Togo: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-unit-of-gdp/cote-d-ivoire/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-unit-of-gdp/cote-d-ivoire/togo/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Togo: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,782 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.