What is the difference in agricultural land use, per unit of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2023

New Zealand

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

108th

New Zealand rank

111th

Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
New Zealand

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in New Zealand, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 108th and New Zealand ranks 111th of 206 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land use, per unit of gdp, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Zealand?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land use, per unit of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand rank globally for agricultural land use, per unit of gdp?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 108th and New Zealand ranks 111th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-zealand/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,782 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.