Belgium vs Norway: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP
Belgium
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Norway
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Belgium rank
178th
Norway rank
179th
Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP over time
- Belgium
- Norway
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Norway, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Belgium ranks 178th and Norway ranks 179th of 206 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural land use, per unit of gdp, Belgium or Norway?
- Belgium, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agricultural land use, per unit of gdp between Belgium and Norway?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Norway?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Norway rank globally for agricultural land use, per unit of gdp?
- Belgium ranks 178th and Norway ranks 179th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural land use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.