What is the difference in agricultural land use, per unit of gdp between Antigua and Barbuda and Cyprus?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Cyprus?

47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Antigua and Barbuda vs Cyprus: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP

Antigua and Barbuda

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Cyprus

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Antigua and Barbuda rank

170th

Cyprus rank

172nd

Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP over time

Antigua and Barbuda
Cyprus

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cyprus, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Cyprus ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 170th and Cyprus ranks 172nd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Cyprus in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Antigua and Barbuda	Cyprus	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Cyprus
1980s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Cyprus
1990s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Cyprus
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Cyprus
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Antigua and Barbuda
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land use, per unit of gdp, Antigua and Barbuda or Cyprus?: Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cyprus as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural land use, per unit of gdp between Antigua and Barbuda and Cyprus?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Cyprus?: 47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Cyprus rank globally for agricultural land use, per unit of gdp?: Antigua and Barbuda ranks 170th and Cyprus ranks 172nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Cyprus: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-unit-of-gdp/antigua-and-barbuda/cyprus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-use-per-unit-of-gdp/antigua-and-barbuda/cyprus/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Cyprus: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land use, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 10,782 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Agricultural land use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.