United States of America vs Yugoslav SFR: Abaca — Import Quantity

United States of America
0 t
in 2013
Yugoslav SFR
0 t
in 1991
United States of America rank
10th
Yugoslav SFR rank
7th

Abaca — Import Quantity over time

  • United States of America
  • Yugoslav SFR
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119872013

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 31 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

United States of America ranks 10th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 7th of 28 groups.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United States of America Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 28,464 t 470.89 t 27,993 t United States of America
1970s 22,860 t 116.7 t 22,743 t United States of America
1980s 16,600 t 24.5 t 16,575 t United States of America
1990s 11,435 t 0 t 11,435 t United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher abaca — import quantity, United States of America or Yugoslav SFR?
United States of America, at 0 t against 0 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2013.
What is the difference in abaca — import quantity between United States of America and Yugoslav SFR?
0 t, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United States of America and Yugoslav SFR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do United States of America and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for abaca — import quantity?
United States of America ranks 10th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 7th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United States of America vs Yugoslav SFR: Abaca — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-import-quantity/united-states-of-america/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-import-quantity/united-states-of-america/yugoslav-sfr/">United States of America vs Yugoslav SFR: Abaca — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Abaca — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
101 places, 5,163 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.