Ethiopia PDR vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Abaca — Import Quantity

Ethiopia PDR
3 t
in 1992
Low Income Food Deficit Countries
7 t
in 2013
Ethiopia PDR rank
6th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank
8th

Abaca — Import Quantity over time

  • Ethiopia PDR
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119872013

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries currently reports 7 t against 3 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 4 t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries's figure about 2.3 times Ethiopia PDR's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia PDR ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 8th of 68 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia PDR Low Income Food Deficit Countries Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 1,408 t 1,408 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
1970s 0 t 741.4 t 741.4 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
1980s 0 t 363.6 t 363.6 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
1990s 495 t 537.33 t 42.33 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher abaca — import quantity, Ethiopia PDR or Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries, at 7 t against 3 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2013.
What is the difference in abaca — import quantity between Ethiopia PDR and Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
4 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Ethiopia PDR and Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank globally for abaca — import quantity?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 8th of 68 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia PDR vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Abaca — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-import-quantity/ethiopia-pdr/low-income-food-deficit-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-import-quantity/ethiopia-pdr/low-income-food-deficit-countries/">Ethiopia PDR vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Abaca — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Abaca — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
101 places, 5,163 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.