Philippines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Abaca — Domestic supply quantity

Philippines
62,073 t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania
0 t
in 2013
Philippines rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
2nd

Abaca — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Philippines
  • United Republic of Tanzania
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119872013

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 62,073 t against 0 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 62,073 t.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Philippines ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 73 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 27,353 t 0 t 27,353 t Philippines
1970s 83,299 t 0 t 83,299 t Philippines
1980s 69,322 t 0 t 69,322 t Philippines
1990s 46,096 t 0 t 46,096 t Philippines
2000s 54,166 t -2.7 t 54,169 t Philippines
2010s 58,682 t 0 t 58,682 t Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher abaca — domestic supply quantity, Philippines or United Republic of Tanzania?
Philippines, at 62,073 t against 0 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2013.
What is the difference in abaca — domestic supply quantity between Philippines and United Republic of Tanzania?
62,073 t, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and United Republic of Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Philippines and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for abaca — domestic supply quantity?
Philippines ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 73 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Abaca — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-domestic-supply-quantity/philippines/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-domestic-supply-quantity/philippines/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Philippines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Abaca — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Abaca — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
107 places, 5,481 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.