Land Locked Developing Countries vs Tunisia: Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity

Land Locked Developing Countries
0 t
in 2013
Tunisia
0 t
in 2013
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
14th
Tunisia rank
11th

Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries
  • Tunisia
0510152025196119872013

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 14th and Tunisia ranks 11th of 31 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8889 t 0 t 0.8889 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1970s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
1980s 2 t 3.3 t 1.3 t Tunisia
1990s 2.6 t 0 t 2.6 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2000s 2.3 t 1.4 t 0.9 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher abaca β€” domestic supply quantity, Land Locked Developing Countries or Tunisia?
Land Locked Developing Countries, at 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia as of 2013.
What is the difference in abaca β€” domestic supply quantity between Land Locked Developing Countries and Tunisia?
0 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries and Tunisia?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries and Tunisia rank globally for abaca β€” domestic supply quantity?
Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 14th and Tunisia ranks 11th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries vs Tunisia: Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-domestic-supply-quantity/land-locked-developing-countries/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-domestic-supply-quantity/land-locked-developing-countries/tunisia/">Land Locked Developing Countries vs Tunisia: Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
107 places, 5,481 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.