Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Poland: Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity

Egypt, Arab Republic of
0 t
in 2013
Poland
0 t
in 2013
Egypt, Arab Republic of rank
11th
Poland rank
11th

Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Egypt, Arab Republic of
  • Poland
02505007501.0k196119872013

How they compare

Egypt, Arab Republic of currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Poland, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 11th and Poland ranks 11th of 73 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt, Arab Republic of averaged higher in 5 and Poland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt, Arab Republic of Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 186 t 497.44 t 311.44 t Poland
1970s 362.1 t 28 t 334.1 t Egypt, Arab Republic of
1980s 137 t 0 t 137 t Egypt, Arab Republic of
1990s 26.5 t 0 t 26.5 t Egypt, Arab Republic of
2000s 19.9 t 0.3 t 19.6 t Egypt, Arab Republic of
2010s 11.25 t 0 t 11.25 t Egypt, Arab Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher abaca β€” domestic supply quantity, Egypt, Arab Republic of or Poland?
Egypt, Arab Republic of, at 0 t against 0 t in Poland as of 2013.
What is the difference in abaca β€” domestic supply quantity between Egypt, Arab Republic of and Poland?
0 t, with Egypt, Arab Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Republic of and Poland?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Egypt, Arab Republic of and Poland rank globally for abaca β€” domestic supply quantity?
Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 11th and Poland ranks 11th of 73 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Poland: Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-domestic-supply-quantity/egypt-arab-rep/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/abaca-domestic-supply-quantity/egypt-arab-rep/poland/">Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Poland: Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Abaca β€” Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
107 places, 5,481 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.