Viet Nam vs Zimbabwe: 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)
2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old) over time
- Viet Nam
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 68.4 % against 8 % in Viet Nam, a difference of 60.4 %.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 8.6 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Viet Nam ranks 11th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 11 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Viet Nam | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.33 % | 66.33 % | 61 % | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 8.12 % | 69.86 % | 61.74 % | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old), Viet Nam or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 68.4 % against 8 % in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old) between Viet Nam and Zimbabwe?
- 60.4 %, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Viet Nam and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Viet Nam and Zimbabwe rank globally for 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)?
- Viet Nam ranks 11th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 11 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old and over) (no breakdown by urbanisation) — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.