Kiribati vs Zambia: 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)
2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old) over time
- Kiribati
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 44.6 % against 43.9 % in Kiribati, a difference of 0.7 %.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 30th and Zambia ranks 29th of 121 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41 % | 53.35 % | 12.35 % | Zambia |
| 2020s | 42.16 % | 46.92 % | 4.76 % | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old), Kiribati or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 44.6 % against 43.9 % in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old) between Kiribati and Zambia?
- 0.7 %, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zambia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Zambia rank globally for 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)?
- Kiribati ranks 30th and Zambia ranks 29th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old and over) (no breakdown by urbanisation) — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.