Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia vs Kiribati: 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)

Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia
8.6 %
in 2024
Kiribati
43.9 %
in 2024
Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia rank
28th
Kiribati rank
30th

2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old) over time

  • Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia
  • Kiribati
10203040201520192024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 43.9 % against 8.6 % in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia, a difference of 35.3 %.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 5.1 times Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia ranks 28th and Kiribati ranks 30th of 37 groups.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia Kiribati Difference Ahead
2010s 11 % 41 % 30 % Kiribati
2020s 9.06 % 42.16 % 33.1 % Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old), Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 43.9 % against 8.6 % in Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old) between Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia and Kiribati?
35.3 %, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia and Kiribati?
7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
How do Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia and Kiribati rank globally for 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)?
Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia ranks 28th and Kiribati ranks 30th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old and over) (no breakdown by urbanisation) — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia vs Kiribati: 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/2-1-2-prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-15-years-old-and-over-no-breakdown/eastern-asia-and-south-eastern-asia/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/2-1-2-prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-15-years-old-and-over-no-breakdown/eastern-asia-and-south-eastern-asia/kiribati/">Eastern Asia and South-eastern Asia vs Kiribati: 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old and over) (no breakdown by urbanisation) — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 1,581 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.