Greece vs Serbia: 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)
2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old) over time
- Greece
- Serbia
How they compare
Greece currently reports 7.5 % against 7.2 % in Serbia, a difference of 0.3 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 103rd and Serbia ranks 104th of 121 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.44 % | 13.18 % | 1.26 % | Greece |
| 2020s | 7.22 % | 12 % | 4.78 % | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old), Greece or Serbia?
- Greece, at 7.5 % against 7.2 % in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old) between Greece and Serbia?
- 0.3 %, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Greece and Serbia rank globally for 2.1.2 prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old)?
- Greece ranks 103rd and Serbia ranks 104th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.1.2 Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (15 years old and over) (no breakdown by urbanisation) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.