Statizoid

Wine — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Wine — Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
Rank
2nd
of 31 groups
All-time high
1 1000 t
in 2018
All-time low
-22 1000 t
in 2014
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Wine — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

-20-15-10-502010201620232010: 0 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: -22 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 0 1000 t2017: -17 1000 t2018: 1 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t2020: 0 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) recorded 0 1000 t for wine — residuals in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over five years.

Over the whole period, wine — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 1 1000 t in 2018 and was at its lowest, -22 1000 t, in 2014.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd of 31 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s -3.8 1000 t -22 1000 t 1 1000 t 10
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 1 Austria 4 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 1000 t compare
  3. 2 Tuvalu 0 1000 t compare
  4. 2 Nauru 0 1000 t compare
  5. 2 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  6. 2 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t compare
  7. 2 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
  8. 2 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  9. 2 Bahrain 0 1000 t compare
  10. 2 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  11. 2 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  12. 2 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  13. 2 Timor-Leste 0 1000 t compare
  14. 2 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  15. 2 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
  16. 2 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  17. 2 Comoros 0 1000 t compare
  18. 2 Djibouti 0 1000 t compare
  19. 2 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t compare
  20. 2 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
  21. 2 Micronesia 0 1000 t compare
  22. 2 Tajikistan 0 1000 t compare
  23. 2 Mauritania 0 1000 t compare
  24. 2 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  25. 2 Afghanistan 0 1000 t compare
  26. 2 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  27. 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  28. 2 Gambia 0 1000 t compare
  29. 2 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  30. 2 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  31. 2 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  32. 2 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  33. 2 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  34. 2 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  35. 2 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 1000 t compare
  36. 2 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  37. 2 Armenia 0 1000 t compare
  38. 2 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t compare
  39. 2 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  40. 2 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  41. 2 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  42. 2 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
  43. 2 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  44. 2 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  45. 2 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t compare
  46. 2 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  47. 2 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  48. 2 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
  49. 2 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  50. 2 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  51. 2 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  52. 2 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  53. 2 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
  54. 2 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  55. 2 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  56. 2 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  57. 2 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  58. 2 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  59. 2 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  60. 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  61. 2 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  62. 2 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  63. 2 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  64. 2 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  65. 2 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  66. 2 Congo 0 1000 t compare
  67. 2 Niger 0 1000 t compare
  68. 2 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  69. 2 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  70. 2 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  71. 2 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  72. 2 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  73. 2 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  74. 2 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  75. 2 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
  76. 2 Slovakia 0 1000 t compare
  77. 2 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  78. 2 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  79. 2 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  80. 2 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  81. 2 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  82. 2 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  83. 2 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  84. 2 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  85. 2 Viet Nam 0 1000 t compare
  86. 2 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  87. 2 Croatia 0 1000 t compare
  88. 2 Serbia 0 1000 t compare
  89. 2 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  90. 2 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
  91. 2 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  92. 2 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  93. 2 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  94. 2 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  95. 2 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  96. 2 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  97. 2 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  98. 2 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  99. 2 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  100. 2 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  101. 2 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  102. 2 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  103. 2 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  104. 2 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  105. 2 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  106. 2 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  107. 2 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  108. 2 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  109. 2 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  110. 2 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  111. 2 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  112. 2 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  113. 2 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  114. 2 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  115. 2 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  116. 2 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  117. 2 Mozambique 0 1000 t compare
  118. 2 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  119. 2 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  120. 2 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  121. 2 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  122. 2 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t compare
  123. 2 Madagascar 0 1000 t compare
  124. 2 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  125. 2 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  126. 2 France 0 1000 t compare
  127. 2 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t compare
  128. 2 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  129. 2 Türkiye 0 1000 t compare
  130. 2 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  131. 2 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t compare
  132. 2 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  133. 2 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  134. 2 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  135. 2 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 1000 t compare
  136. 2 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  137. 2 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  138. 2 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  139. 2 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  140. 2 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  141. 2 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  142. 2 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  143. 2 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  144. 2 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  145. 2 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  146. 2 Ethiopia 0 1000 t compare
  147. 2 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  148. 2 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  149. 2 Côte d'Ivoire 0 1000 t compare
  150. 2 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  151. 2 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
  152. 2 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  153. 2 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  154. 2 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  155. 2 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  156. 2 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  157. 2 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  158. 2 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  159. 2 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  160. 2 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  161. 2 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  162. 2 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  163. 2 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  164. 2 India 0 1000 t compare
  165. 2 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  166. 2 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  167. 2 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  168. 2 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t compare
  169. 2 Egypt 0 1000 t compare
  170. 2 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  171. 2 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  172. 2 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  173. 2 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  174. 2 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  175. 2 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  176. 2 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  177. 2 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare
  178. 2 China 0 1000 t compare
  179. 2 Caribbean 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 213 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is wine — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Wine — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest wine — residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 1 1000 t in 2018.
What is the lowest wine — residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -22 1000 t in 2014.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for wine — residuals?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Wine — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Wine — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,889 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.