Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Pakistan
Pakistan: Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Pakistan, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Pakistan is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
The figure is down 2.4% on the previous year and down 22.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Pakistan peaked at 0.0011 ha per US$ of GDP in 1962 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
That places Pakistan 3rd out of 110 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0011 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0011 ha per US$ of GDP | +1.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0011 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 1964 | 0.001 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1965 | 0.0009 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0008 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.4% |
| 1967 | 0.0007 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 1968 | 0.0007 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.9% |
| 1969 | 0.0007 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0006 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.4% |
| 1971 | 0.0006 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 1972 | 0.0006 ha per US$ of GDP | +9.9% |
| 1973 | 0.0009 ha per US$ of GDP | +51.9% |
| 1974 | 0.0007 ha per US$ of GDP | -26.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0005 ha per US$ of GDP | -24.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0005 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 1977 | 0.0004 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0004 ha per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0003 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 1980 | 0.0003 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 1981 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 1982 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 1983 | 0.0003 ha per US$ of GDP | +9.7% |
| 1984 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1985 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 1986 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 1987 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 1988 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.8% |
| 1989 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | +1.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 1991 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 1992 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1993 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 1994 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -34.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +14.2% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -16.8% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +1.2% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +9.5% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +8.4% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +12.0% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
Pakistan compared with similar countries
- Pakistan's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 23.6× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Pakistan's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 21.5× the median. (19 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Pakistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1973 | +51.9% | 0.0006 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0009 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0009 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0011 ha per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0006 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0009 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
- 1 Afghanistan 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 2 Kazakhstan 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 4 Ukraine 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 5 Tajikistan 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 6 Turkmenistan 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
More agriculture & rural data for Pakistan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 6.28 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2302 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 367.4 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.984 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6047 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 23.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 23.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 4.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Pakistan?
- Wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Pakistan was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0011 ha per US$ of GDP in 1962.
- What is the lowest wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Pakistan rank for wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Pakistan ranks 3rd out of 110 countries with data for 2024.
- Is wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 22.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Wheat — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Wheat — Area harvested ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Wheat — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Wheat — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.