True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value in China
China: True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value was 53,342 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
53,342 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 1.0%
World rank
1st
of 24 countries
All-time high
62,549 1000 Int$
in 2017
All-time low
5,467 1000 Int$
in 2010
Years of data
64
1961–2024
True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value in China, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value in China is 53,342 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.0% on the previous year and up 232.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value in China peaked at 62,549 1000 Int$ in 2017 and was at its lowest, 5,467 1000 Int$, in 2010.
That places China 1st out of 24 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value in China, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 22,572 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 27,588 1000 Int$ | +22.2% |
| 1963 | 32,604 1000 Int$ | +18.2% |
| 1964 | 35,112 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 1965 | 37,620 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1966 | 41,633 1000 Int$ | +10.7% |
| 1967 | 42,636 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1968 | 43,639 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1969 | 43,639 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 45,144 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1971 | 46,147 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1972 | 47,652 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 1973 | 48,655 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1974 | 48,153 1000 Int$ | -1.0% |
| 1975 | 47,150 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1976 | 46,147 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1977 | 45,144 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 1978 | 44,417 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 1979 | 45,119 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1980 | 38,121 1000 Int$ | -15.5% |
| 1981 | 25,080 1000 Int$ | -34.2% |
| 1982 | 18,058 1000 Int$ | -28.0% |
| 1983 | 14,496 1000 Int$ | -19.7% |
| 1984 | 16,553 1000 Int$ | +14.2% |
| 1985 | 27,530 1000 Int$ | +66.3% |
| 1986 | 27,584 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 1987 | 32,604 1000 Int$ | +18.2% |
| 1988 | 34,109 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 1989 | 13,193 1000 Int$ | -61.3% |
| 1990 | 15,600 1000 Int$ | +18.2% |
| 1991 | 9,029 1000 Int$ | -42.1% |
| 1992 | 12,239 1000 Int$ | +35.6% |
| 1993 | 13,694 1000 Int$ | +11.9% |
| 1994 | 11,035 1000 Int$ | -19.4% |
| 1995 | 11,236 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1996 | 10,333 1000 Int$ | -8.0% |
| 1997 | 9,631 1000 Int$ | -6.8% |
| 1998 | 8,477 1000 Int$ | -12.0% |
| 1999 | 6,621 1000 Int$ | -21.9% |
| 2000 | 8,527 1000 Int$ | +28.8% |
| 2001 | 10,132 1000 Int$ | +18.8% |
| 2002 | 15,098 1000 Int$ | +49.0% |
| 2003 | 13,192 1000 Int$ | -12.6% |
| 2004 | 18,007 1000 Int$ | +36.5% |
| 2005 | 20,716 1000 Int$ | +15.0% |
| 2006 | 41,582 1000 Int$ | +100.7% |
| 2007 | 24,027 1000 Int$ | -42.2% |
| 2008 | 15,098 1000 Int$ | -37.2% |
| 2009 | 6,220 1000 Int$ | -58.8% |
| 2010 | 5,467 1000 Int$ | -12.1% |
| 2011 | 7,925 1000 Int$ | +45.0% |
| 2012 | 7,273 1000 Int$ | -8.2% |
| 2013 | 9,530 1000 Int$ | +31.0% |
| 2014 | 16,051 1000 Int$ | +68.4% |
| 2015 | 13,042 1000 Int$ | -18.7% |
| 2016 | 35,914 1000 Int$ | +175.4% |
| 2017 | 62,549 1000 Int$ | +74.2% |
| 2018 | 53,270 1000 Int$ | -14.8% |
| 2019 | 50,578 1000 Int$ | -5.1% |
| 2020 | 55,466 1000 Int$ | +9.7% |
| 2021 | 53,104 1000 Int$ | -4.3% |
| 2022 | 53,049 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2023 | 53,873 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2024 | 53,342 1000 Int$ | -1.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36,338 1000 Int$ | 22,572 1000 Int$ | 43,639 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 46,373 1000 Int$ | 44,417 1000 Int$ | 48,655 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 24,733 1000 Int$ | 13,193 1000 Int$ | 38,121 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 10,790 1000 Int$ | 6,621 1000 Int$ | 15,600 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 17,260 1000 Int$ | 6,220 1000 Int$ | 41,582 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 26,160 1000 Int$ | 5,467 1000 Int$ | 62,549 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 53,767 1000 Int$ | 53,049 1000 Int$ | 55,466 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near China
- 1 China, mainland 53,342 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 USSR 7,022 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 4,785 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for China
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0666 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 923.03 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3366 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 6.66 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 6.66 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value in China?
- True hemp, raw or retted — gross production value in China was 53,342 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 62,549 1000 Int$ in 2017.
- What is the lowest true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 5,467 1000 Int$ in 2010.
- How does China rank for true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value?
- China ranks 1st out of 24 countries with data for 2024.
- Is true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 232.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.