Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) in United Republic of Tanzania
United Republic of Tanzania: Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) was 107,714 million SLC in 2023. ▲ Rising
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) in United Republic of Tanzania, 2004–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in million SLC.
Analysis
In 2023, total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) in United Republic of Tanzania stood at 107,714 million SLC. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 13.9% on the previous year and up 115.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) in United Republic of Tanzania peaked at 107,714 million SLC in 2023 and was at its lowest, 11,566 million SLC, in 2005.
That places United Republic of Tanzania 10th out of 97 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) in United Republic of Tanzania, year by year
| Year | million SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 17,937 million SLC | — |
| 2005 | 11,566 million SLC | -35.5% |
| 2006 | 19,689 million SLC | +70.2% |
| 2007 | 29,735 million SLC | +51.0% |
| 2008 | 38,577 million SLC | +29.7% |
| 2009 | 42,512 million SLC | +10.2% |
| 2010 | 53,398 million SLC | +25.6% |
| 2011 | 50,212 million SLC | -6.0% |
| 2012 | 51,171 million SLC | +1.9% |
| 2013 | 50,021 million SLC | -2.2% |
| 2014 | 59,064 million SLC | +18.1% |
| 2015 | 48,107 million SLC | -18.6% |
| 2016 | 51,125 million SLC | +6.3% |
| 2020 | 75,625 million SLC | +47.9% |
| 2021 | 87,702 million SLC | +16.0% |
| 2022 | 94,562 million SLC | +7.8% |
| 2023 | 107,714 million SLC | +13.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26,669 million SLC | 11,566 million SLC | 42,512 million SLC | 6 |
| 2010s | 51,871 million SLC | 48,107 million SLC | 59,064 million SLC | 7 |
| 2020s | 91,401 million SLC | 75,625 million SLC | 107,714 million SLC | 4 |
Countries ranked near United Republic of Tanzania
More agriculture & rural data for United Republic of Tanzania
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Yield, annual 0.2828 % change on previous year (2024)
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested -26.5 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered 1.6 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, annual growth rate 11.68 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth 10 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered 3.54 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Production, annual growth rate 11.49 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth 7.69 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered 2.04 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Production, annual growth rate 11.33 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) in United Republic of Tanzania?
- Total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) in United Republic of Tanzania was 107,714 million SLC in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) recorded in United Republic of Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 107,714 million SLC in 2023.
- What is the lowest total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) recorded in United Republic of Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 11,566 million SLC in 2005.
- How does United Republic of Tanzania rank for total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency)?
- United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th out of 97 countries with data for 2023.
- Is total expenditure in agricultural r&d (standard local currency) rising or falling in United Republic of Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 115.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this United Republic of Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Total Expenditure in Agricultural R&D (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.