Tomatoes — Production, per unit of GDP in Cuba
Cuba: Tomatoes — Production, per unit of GDP was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2020. ▼ Falling
Tomatoes — Production, per unit of GDP in Cuba, 1970–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2020, tomatoes — production, per unit of gdp in Cuba stood at 0 t per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 51 years on record.
The figure is down 41.7% on the previous year and down 68.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — production, per unit of gdp in Cuba peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1974 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 2020.
That places Cuba 45th out of 148 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 51 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Production, per unit of GDP in Cuba, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +30.2% |
| 1972 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -42.2% |
| 1973 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +43.0% |
| 1974 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +160.6% |
| 1975 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -50.6% |
| 1976 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.9% |
| 1977 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 1978 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -30.7% |
| 1979 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 1980 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +24.2% |
| 1981 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +48.9% |
| 1982 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -30.1% |
| 1983 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -36.1% |
| 1984 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +37.6% |
| 1985 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +24.3% |
| 1986 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 1987 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.2% |
| 1988 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +46.1% |
| 1989 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -21.2% |
| 1990 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -40.1% |
| 1991 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +25.0% |
| 1992 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +67.0% |
| 1993 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -36.0% |
| 1994 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -56.2% |
| 1995 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +76.4% |
| 1996 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +40.2% |
| 1997 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1998 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -22.0% |
| 1999 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +149.0% |
| 2000 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +27.0% |
| 2001 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -21.2% |
| 2002 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +3.3% |
| 2003 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +21.4% |
| 2004 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +15.1% |
| 2005 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 2006 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -30.8% |
| 2007 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 2008 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 2009 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +27.6% |
| 2010 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -33.5% |
| 2011 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 2012 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2013 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +15.4% |
| 2014 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -35.9% |
| 2015 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +12.3% |
| 2016 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.7% |
| 2017 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +14.4% |
| 2018 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2019 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 2020 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -41.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 1 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More agriculture & rural data for Cuba
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -19.64 % change on previous year (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0276 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 265.29 current US$ per person (2020)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.6522 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2277 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 1.24 (2024)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 1.24 (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.5% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — production, per unit of gdp in Cuba?
- Tomatoes — production, per unit of gdp in Cuba was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1974.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2020.
- How does Cuba rank for tomatoes — production, per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 45th out of 148 countries with data for 2020.
- Is tomatoes — production, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 68.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.