Tomatoes — Production, per square kilometre in New Zealand
New Zealand: Tomatoes — Production, per square kilometre was 0.1981 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Tomatoes — Production, per square kilometre in New Zealand, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
New Zealand recorded 0.1981 t per square kilometre for tomatoes — production, per square kilometre in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.2% on the previous year and down 38.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — production, per square kilometre in New Zealand peaked at 0.5628 t per square kilometre in 1994 and was at its lowest, 0.1404 t per square kilometre, in 1966.
That places New Zealand 109th out of 148 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Production, per square kilometre in New Zealand, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1409 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1724 t per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 1963 | 0.1925 t per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1964 | 0.1755 t per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1965 | 0.1895 t per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1966 | 0.1404 t per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 1967 | 0.1432 t per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1968 | 0.1916 t per square kilometre | +33.8% |
| 1969 | 0.1886 t per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1970 | 0.1684 t per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1971 | 0.1602 t per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1972 | 0.2281 t per square kilometre | +42.4% |
| 1973 | 0.2444 t per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1974 | 0.2487 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1975 | 0.1908 t per square kilometre | -23.3% |
| 1976 | 0.1793 t per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1977 | 0.2313 t per square kilometre | +29.0% |
| 1978 | 0.2347 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1979 | 0.185 t per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 1980 | 0.2176 t per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1981 | 0.1822 t per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1982 | 0.2317 t per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 1983 | 0.2279 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1984 | 0.2279 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.2279 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.2658 t per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1987 | 0.2658 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.3038 t per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1989 | 0.3038 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.3418 t per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1991 | 0.3798 t per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1992 | 0.2947 t per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 1993 | 0.2639 t per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1994 | 0.5628 t per square kilometre | +113.2% |
| 1995 | 0.5184 t per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1996 | 0.5245 t per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1997 | 0.3798 t per square kilometre | -27.6% |
| 1998 | 0.2564 t per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 1999 | 0.3304 t per square kilometre | +28.9% |
| 2000 | 0.3304 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.3304 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.3304 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.3798 t per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2004 | 0.3608 t per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2005 | 0.3418 t per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2006 | 0.3494 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2007 | 0.4178 t per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 2008 | 0.3418 t per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 2009 | 0.3494 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2010 | 0.3429 t per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2011 | 0.352 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2012 | 0.3417 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2013 | 0.32 t per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2014 | 0.304 t per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2015 | 0.2814 t per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 2016 | 0.2656 t per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2017 | 0.1827 t per square kilometre | -31.2% |
| 2018 | 0.2143 t per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2019 | 0.2166 t per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2020 | 0.1655 t per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 2021 | 0.2088 t per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 2022 | 0.1984 t per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2023 | 0.1981 t per square kilometre | -0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1705 t per square kilometre | 0.1404 t per square kilometre | 0.1925 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2071 t per square kilometre | 0.1602 t per square kilometre | 0.2487 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2454 t per square kilometre | 0.1822 t per square kilometre | 0.3038 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.3852 t per square kilometre | 0.2564 t per square kilometre | 0.5628 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3532 t per square kilometre | 0.3304 t per square kilometre | 0.4178 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2821 t per square kilometre | 0.1827 t per square kilometre | 0.352 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1927 t per square kilometre | 0.1655 t per square kilometre | 0.2088 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near New Zealand
- 106 Denmark 0.2517 t per square kilometre compare
- 107 Uruguay 0.2076 t per square kilometre compare
- 108 Mali 0.2018 t per square kilometre compare
- 110 Uganda 0.1956 t per square kilometre compare
- 111 French Polynesia 0.1898 t per square kilometre compare
- 112 Antigua and Barbuda 0.1838 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for New Zealand
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -10.07 % change on previous year (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,976 current US$ per person (2023)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.275 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.16 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2023)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — production, per square kilometre in New Zealand?
- Tomatoes — production, per square kilometre in New Zealand was 0.1981 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — production, per square kilometre recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5628 t per square kilometre in 1994.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — production, per square kilometre recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1404 t per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does New Zealand rank for tomatoes — production, per square kilometre?
- New Zealand ranks 109th out of 148 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 38.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.