Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Angola
Angola: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) was 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Angola, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Angola stood at 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 30.3% on the previous year and up 81.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Angola peaked at 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Angola 100th out of 124 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Angola, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0004 1000 USD per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0004 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0005 1000 USD per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0005 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0007 1000 USD per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 1971 | 0.0007 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0007 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0009 1000 USD per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0009 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0009 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0011 1000 USD per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0011 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0013 1000 USD per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1979 | 0.0013 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0013 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0014 1000 USD per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0014 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0016 1000 USD per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1984 | 0.0016 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1986 | 0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.002 1000 USD per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0022 1000 USD per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1990 | 0.0023 1000 USD per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1991 | 0.0024 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1992 | 0.0045 1000 USD per square kilometre | +83.9% |
| 1993 | 0.0062 1000 USD per square kilometre | +37.8% |
| 1994 | 0.008 1000 USD per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0099 1000 USD per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1996 | 0.012 1000 USD per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0143 1000 USD per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1998 | 0.0167 1000 USD per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0195 1000 USD per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 2000 | 0.0224 1000 USD per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2001 | 0.0257 1000 USD per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0293 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2003 | 0.0332 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2004 | 0.0237 1000 USD per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 2005 | 0.0272 1000 USD per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2006 | 0.0309 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2007 | 0.0348 1000 USD per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0393 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0468 1000 USD per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0542 1000 USD per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 2011 | 0.0616 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2012 | 0.0689 1000 USD per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2013 | 0.076 1000 USD per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2014 | 0.083 1000 USD per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0867 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2016 | 0.0985 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2017 | 0.1116 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2018 | 0.0973 1000 USD per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 2019 | 0.1012 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2020 | 0.1065 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2021 | 0.1014 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2022 | 0.1061 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2023 | 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre | +30.3% |
Angola compared with similar countries
- Angola's 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.6504 1000 USD per square kilometre, 21% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Angola's 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.5338 1000 USD per square kilometre, 26% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Angola changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | +100.0% | 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0004 1000 USD per square kilometre |
| 1992 | +83.9% | 0.0024 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0045 1000 USD per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0003 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0005 1000 USD per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.001 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0007 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0013 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0017 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0013 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0022 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0096 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0023 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0195 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0313 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0224 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0468 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0839 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0542 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1116 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1131 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1014 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Angola
- 97 Mali 0.1503 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 98 South Africa 0.1412 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 99 Turkmenistan 0.1405 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 101 Estonia 0.1227 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 102 Latvia 0.1148 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 103 Norway 0.1129 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Angola
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 38.81 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2524 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 789.91 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.2141 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2854 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 25.2% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 25.2% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Angola?
- Tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Angola was 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Angola rank for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
- Angola ranks 100th out of 124 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is up 81.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.