Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Kyrgyzstan, 1998–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Kyrgyzstan is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 27 years on record.
That represents a change of down 17.2% on the previous year and down 44.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
That places Kyrgyzstan 10th out of 148 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1999 | 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +52.4% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +2.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -41.7% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +18.3% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -22.3% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -23.2% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +13.6% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -25.0% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +23.9% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +11.6% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -18.4% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -17.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 2 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More agriculture & rural data for Kyrgyzstan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 15.58 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 246.46 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.64 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6525 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 8.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 8.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Kyrgyzstan?
- Tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Kyrgyzstan was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2000.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th out of 148 countries with data for 2024.
- Is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 44.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.