Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Poland
Poland: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) was 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017. ▲ Rising
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Poland, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Poland recorded 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in 2017. That is the highest value across all 57 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.6% on the previous year and up 30.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Poland peaked at 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.1545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
Poland ranks 34th of 148 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 57 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Poland, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.3103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -50.2% |
| 1963 | 0.4589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +197.0% |
| 1964 | 0.5738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1965 | 0.287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1966 | 0.4387 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +52.9% |
| 1967 | 0.515 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1968 | 0.5352 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1969 | 0.4934 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1970 | 0.5511 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1971 | 0.5346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1972 | 0.6118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1973 | 0.5937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1974 | 0.3445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -42.0% |
| 1975 | 0.6496 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +88.6% |
| 1976 | 0.5899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1977 | 0.294 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -50.2% |
| 1978 | 0.2481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1979 | 0.7316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +194.9% |
| 1980 | 0.2802 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -61.7% |
| 1981 | 0.6902 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +146.3% |
| 1982 | 0.6878 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1983 | 0.798 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1984 | 0.3947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -50.5% |
| 1985 | 0.4162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1986 | 0.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +73.0% |
| 1987 | 0.5488 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1988 | 0.819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 1989 | 0.7017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1990 | 0.6437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1991 | 0.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1992 | 0.6274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1993 | 0.5633 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 1994 | 0.5834 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1995 | 0.6238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1996 | 0.3583 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -42.6% |
| 1997 | 0.3405 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1998 | 0.5534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1999 | 0.5178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2000 | 0.4842 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2001 | 0.4255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 2002 | 0.9551 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +124.5% |
| 2003 | 0.9427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2004 | 0.9049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2005 | 0.9336 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2006 | 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2007 | 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2008 | 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2009 | 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2010 | 0.8675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2011 | 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +27.7% |
| 2012 | 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2013 | 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2014 | 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2015 | 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2016 | 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2017 | 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Poland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1963 | +197.0% | 0.1545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1979 | +194.9% | 0.2481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.7316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1981 | +146.3% | 0.2802 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.6902 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 2002 | +124.5% | 0.4255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.9551 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.5738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.5149 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.7316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2802 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.5512 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.3405 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.8675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 31 Tajikistan 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Morocco 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Romania 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Ukraine 1.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Cameroon 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Benin 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Poland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0245 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 697.32 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.6232 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3991 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Poland?
- Tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Poland was 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Poland rank for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Poland ranks 34th out of 148 countries with data for 2017.
- Is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 30.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.