Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) was 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.4%
World rank
146th
of 148 countries
All-time high
0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 1980
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Papua New Guinea, 1961–2023

0000.001196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Papua New Guinea is 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of up 0.4% on the previous year and up 8.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Papua New Guinea peaked at 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1980.

Papua New Guinea ranks 146th of 148 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Papua New Guinea, year by year

Annual values for Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, 1961 to 2023.
Year 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Change
1961 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre —
1962 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +26.7%
1963 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -10.5%
1964 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.0%
1965 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -29.4%
1966 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +25.0%
1967 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.3%
1968 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.0%
1969 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -32.3%
1970 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +95.2%
1971 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -56.1%
1972 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +38.9%
1973 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +72.0%
1974 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -23.3%
1975 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +297.0%
1976 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -57.3%
1977 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +85.7%
1978 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -89.4%
1979 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +263.6%
1980 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -75.0%
1981 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +390.0%
1982 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +132.7%
1983 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -51.8%
1984 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -10.9%
1985 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -16.3%
1986 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -43.9%
1987 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +417.4%
1988 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +11.8%
1989 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +7.5%
1990 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +4.9%
1991 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.3%
1992 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.0%
1993 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +7.7%
1994 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +7.2%
1995 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.1%
1996 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.8%
1997 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -30.6%
1998 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +10.9%
1999 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +6.3%
2000 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +19.1%
2001 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +13.3%
2002 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -7.3%
2003 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.0%
2004 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +10.0%
2005 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.4%
2006 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +11.2%
2007 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.1%
2008 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +5.8%
2009 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -3.5%
2010 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.6%
2011 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.9%
2012 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -9.2%
2013 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.8%
2014 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.5%
2015 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +5.3%
2016 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -4.2%
2017 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.4%
2018 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.2%
2019 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.0%
2020 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.2%
2021 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.4%
2022 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -0.4%
2023 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.4%

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Papua New Guinea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
1987 +417.4% 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
1981 +390.0% 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
1975 +297.0% 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
1979 +263.6% 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
1982 +132.7% 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
1970 +95.2% 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9
1970s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
1980s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
1990s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2000s 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2010s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2020s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea

  1. 143 Botswana 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  2. 144 Mongolia 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  3. 145 Gabon 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  4. 147 Nauru 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
  5. 147 Singapore 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 149 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Papua New Guinea

All data for Papua New Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Papua New Guinea?
Tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Papua New Guinea was 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Papua New Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2011.
What is the lowest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Papua New Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1980.
How does Papua New Guinea rank for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Papua New Guinea ranks 146th out of 148 countries with data for 2023.
Is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Papua New Guinea. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/tomatoes-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/">Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Papua New Guinea</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,554 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.