Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Finland
Finland: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) was 0.0617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017. ▲ Rising
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Finland, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Finland is 0.0617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2017.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.0% on the previous year and up 3.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Finland peaked at 0.0636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Finland 116th out of 148 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 57 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Finland, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1963 | 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1964 | 0.0108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1965 | 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1967 | 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1969 | 0.0128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +36.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0281 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +119.5% |
| 1972 | 0.027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1973 | 0.0252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0306 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0306 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1976 | 0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1977 | 0.0312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1978 | 0.0366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1979 | 0.0398 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1980 | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0459 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0464 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0544 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1984 | 0.0463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1985 | 0.0438 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1986 | 0.0417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1987 | 0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0471 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1989 | 0.0466 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1990 | 0.0498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1991 | 0.0469 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1992 | 0.0474 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1993 | 0.0481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1994 | 0.0541 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 1995 | 0.0489 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1996 | 0.0519 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1997 | 0.0516 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0556 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 2000 | 0.0553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2001 | 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2002 | 0.0569 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2003 | 0.056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0541 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2005 | 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2006 | 0.0607 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2007 | 0.0598 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0634 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2009 | 0.0601 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2011 | 0.0629 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2012 | 0.0601 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2013 | 0.0601 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2015 | 0.0609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2016 | 0.0636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2017 | 0.0617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Finland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1971 | +119.5% | 0.0128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0281 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0398 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0544 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0503 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0469 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0556 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0579 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0634 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0601 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 113 Peru 0.0841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 114 Fiji 0.0831 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Ecuador 0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 117 Libya 0.0613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Guyana 0.0606 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Paraguay 0.0549 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Finland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0261 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,466 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5476 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2548 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 7.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Finland?
- Tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Finland was 0.0617 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Finland rank for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Finland ranks 116th out of 148 countries with data for 2017.
- Is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.