Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) was 0.544 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Costa Rica, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 0.544 1000 Int$ per square kilometre for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in 2023.
The figure is up 0.7% on the previous year and down 3.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Costa Rica peaked at 0.6341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.0765 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Costa Rica ranks 59th of 148 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0765 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0802 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1963 | 0.0839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1965 | 0.0932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0988 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1967 | 0.1044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1968 | 0.1072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1969 | 0.1138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1970 | 0.1184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1971 | 0.1212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1972 | 0.1306 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1973 | 0.1352 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1974 | 0.1399 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1975 | 0.1445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1976 | 0.1492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1977 | 0.1539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1978 | 0.1585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1979 | 0.1632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1980 | 0.1678 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1981 | 0.1725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1982 | 0.1818 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1983 | 0.1865 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1984 | 0.1911 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1985 | 0.1911 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.1967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1987 | 0.2014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1988 | 0.2079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1989 | 0.0793 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -61.9% |
| 1990 | 0.0839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1991 | 0.0975 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1992 | 0.0826 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1993 | 0.0808 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1994 | 0.0783 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0776 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0786 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1997 | 0.0938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 1998 | 0.2954 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +215.0% |
| 1999 | 0.1786 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -39.5% |
| 2000 | 0.2547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +42.7% |
| 2001 | 0.4639 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +82.1% |
| 2002 | 0.5183 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2003 | 0.4382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2004 | 0.4196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2005 | 0.3856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2006 | 0.4056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2007 | 0.4996 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 2008 | 0.5543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2009 | 0.5754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2010 | 0.4813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 2011 | 0.5678 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 2012 | 0.4901 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 2013 | 0.5609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2014 | 0.4774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2015 | 0.6341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 2016 | 0.5337 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 2017 | 0.5337 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.5157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2019 | 0.4249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 2020 | 0.4914 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 2021 | 0.5401 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2022 | 0.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.544 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Costa Rica changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | +215.0% | 0.0938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2954 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 2001 | +82.1% | 0.2547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4639 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1989 | -61.9% | 0.2079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0793 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1999 | -39.5% | 0.2954 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1786 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 2000 | +42.7% | 0.1786 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 2015 | +32.8% | 0.4774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.6341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0942 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0765 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1415 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1776 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0793 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0776 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2954 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4515 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.5754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.6341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4914 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.544 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 56 Tonga 0.5778 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 57 Chile 0.5655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Mozambique 0.5644 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 60 Burkina Faso 0.5417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 61 El Salvador 0.5209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 62 United Arab Emirates 0.5205 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Costa Rica
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 4.56 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0337 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 672.15 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.57 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2027 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Costa Rica?
- Tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Costa Rica was 0.544 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2015.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0765 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Costa Rica rank for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Costa Rica ranks 59th out of 148 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.