Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Egypt
Egypt: Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.1666 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Egypt, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
Egypt recorded 0.1666 ha per square kilometre for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.2% on the previous year and down 19.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Egypt peaked at 0.253 ha per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.0614 ha per square kilometre, in 1961.
Egypt ranks 22nd of 148 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Egypt, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0614 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0668 ha per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1963 | 0.0718 ha per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1964 | 0.0788 ha per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1965 | 0.0805 ha per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0859 ha per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0887 ha per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1968 | 0.0987 ha per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1969 | 0.1017 ha per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1970 | 0.1004 ha per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1971 | 0.1047 ha per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1972 | 0.1085 ha per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1973 | 0.1165 ha per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1974 | 0.1177 ha per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1975 | 0.1371 ha per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 1976 | 0.13 ha per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1977 | 0.1238 ha per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1978 | 0.1312 ha per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1979 | 0.1387 ha per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1980 | 0.14 ha per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1981 | 0.137 ha per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1982 | 0.1358 ha per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1983 | 0.1367 ha per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1984 | 0.1355 ha per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1985 | 0.1456 ha per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1986 | 0.1663 ha per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1987 | 0.1692 ha per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1988 | 0.1696 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1989 | 0.1794 ha per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1990 | 0.1566 ha per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1991 | 0.1384 ha per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1992 | 0.1527 ha per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1993 | 0.1481 ha per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1994 | 0.1492 ha per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1995 | 0.15 ha per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1996 | 0.1739 ha per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1997 | 0.1694 ha per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1998 | 0.1781 ha per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1999 | 0.1903 ha per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2000 | 0.1963 ha per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2001 | 0.1815 ha per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2002 | 0.192 ha per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2003 | 0.1939 ha per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2004 | 0.1961 ha per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2005 | 0.1959 ha per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2006 | 0.2211 ha per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2007 | 0.2267 ha per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2008 | 0.2413 ha per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2009 | 0.253 ha per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2010 | 0.2174 ha per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 2011 | 0.2134 ha per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2012 | 0.2174 ha per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2013 | 0.2062 ha per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2014 | 0.215 ha per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2015 | 0.1978 ha per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2016 | 0.1858 ha per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2017 | 0.167 ha per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2018 | 0.1756 ha per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2019 | 0.1755 ha per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.1604 ha per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2021 | 0.1506 ha per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2022 | 0.1584 ha per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2023 | 0.1666 ha per square kilometre | +5.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0816 ha per square kilometre | 0.0614 ha per square kilometre | 0.1017 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1209 ha per square kilometre | 0.1004 ha per square kilometre | 0.1387 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1515 ha per square kilometre | 0.1355 ha per square kilometre | 0.1794 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1607 ha per square kilometre | 0.1384 ha per square kilometre | 0.1903 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.2098 ha per square kilometre | 0.1815 ha per square kilometre | 0.253 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1971 ha per square kilometre | 0.167 ha per square kilometre | 0.2174 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.159 ha per square kilometre | 0.1506 ha per square kilometre | 0.1666 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Egypt
- 19 Ghana 0.2124 ha per square kilometre compare
- 20 Portugal 0.2013 ha per square kilometre compare
- 21 Palestine, State of 0.1937 ha per square kilometre compare
- 23 Seychelles 0.15 ha per square kilometre compare
- 24 Uzbekistan 0.1477 ha per square kilometre compare
- 25 Cameroon 0.1392 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Egypt
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 13.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1655 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 510.76 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.38 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.571 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 16.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 16.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Egypt?
- Tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Egypt was 0.1666 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Egypt?
- The highest recorded value was 0.253 ha per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Egypt?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0614 ha per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Egypt rank for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Egypt ranks 22nd out of 148 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Egypt?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Egypt data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.