Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.0214 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 0.0214 ha per square kilometre for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in 2023.
That represents a change of up 3.2% on the previous year and up 7.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica peaked at 0.0607 ha per square kilometre in 1988 and was at its lowest, 0.0041 ha per square kilometre, in 1995.
Costa Rica ranks 76th of 148 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0235 ha per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1964 | 0.0255 ha per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0255 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0274 ha per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0294 ha per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1968 | 0.0294 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0313 ha per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0333 ha per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1971 | 0.0353 ha per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1972 | 0.0372 ha per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0392 ha per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0392 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0411 ha per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0431 ha per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1977 | 0.045 ha per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1978 | 0.045 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.047 ha per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1980 | 0.049 ha per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1981 | 0.0509 ha per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0529 ha per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1983 | 0.0539 ha per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1984 | 0.0548 ha per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1985 | 0.0548 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0568 ha per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1987 | 0.0588 ha per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1988 | 0.0607 ha per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1989 | 0.0047 ha per square kilometre | -92.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0049 ha per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1991 | 0.0051 ha per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1992 | 0.0043 ha per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1993 | 0.0042 ha per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1994 | 0.0041 ha per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1995 | 0.0041 ha per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0041 ha per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1997 | 0.0049 ha per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1998 | 0.0249 ha per square kilometre | +404.8% |
| 1999 | 0.0202 ha per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2000 | 0.0204 ha per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2001 | 0.0277 ha per square kilometre | +35.3% |
| 2002 | 0.029 ha per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2003 | 0.023 ha per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0196 ha per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2005 | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0279 ha per square kilometre | +29.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0186 ha per square kilometre | -33.2% |
| 2008 | 0.0195 ha per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2009 | 0.0191 ha per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0189 ha per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2011 | 0.0205 ha per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2012 | 0.02 ha per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2013 | 0.0199 ha per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2014 | 0.0176 ha per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2015 | 0.0219 ha per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2017 | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0248 ha per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 2019 | 0.0187 ha per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 2020 | 0.0217 ha per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0218 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2022 | 0.0207 ha per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 2023 | 0.0214 ha per square kilometre | +3.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0261 ha per square kilometre | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | 0.0313 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0405 ha per square kilometre | 0.0333 ha per square kilometre | 0.047 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0497 ha per square kilometre | 0.0047 ha per square kilometre | 0.0607 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0081 ha per square kilometre | 0.0041 ha per square kilometre | 0.0249 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0226 ha per square kilometre | 0.0186 ha per square kilometre | 0.029 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0205 ha per square kilometre | 0.0176 ha per square kilometre | 0.0248 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0214 ha per square kilometre | 0.0207 ha per square kilometre | 0.0218 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 73 Eswatini 0.0244 ha per square kilometre compare
- 74 Togo 0.0224 ha per square kilometre compare
- 75 Turkmenistan 0.0219 ha per square kilometre compare
- 77 Belgium 0.021 ha per square kilometre compare
- 78 Niger 0.0209 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Antigua and Barbuda 0.0205 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Costa Rica
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 4.56 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0337 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 672.15 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.57 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2027 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica?
- Tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Costa Rica was 0.0214 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0607 ha per square kilometre in 1988.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0041 ha per square kilometre in 1995.
- How does Costa Rica rank for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Costa Rica ranks 76th out of 148 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.