Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Philippines
Philippines: Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate was -5.95 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-5.95 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 2.1%
World rank
138th
of 168 countries
All-time high
12.74 % change on previous year
in 1999
All-time low
-19.93 % change on previous year
in 1971
Years of data
63
1962–2024
Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Philippines, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Philippines is -5.95 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.1% on the previous year and down 109.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Philippines peaked at 12.74 % change on previous year in 1999 and was at its lowest, -19.93 % change on previous year, in 1971.
That places Philippines 138th out of 168 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Philippines, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 6.91 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | -11.68 % change on previous year | -269.0% |
| 1964 | -0.8992 % change on previous year | -92.3% |
| 1965 | 7.52 % change on previous year | -936.1% |
| 1966 | -1.87 % change on previous year | -124.9% |
| 1967 | 3.56 % change on previous year | -290.7% |
| 1968 | -4.57 % change on previous year | -228.2% |
| 1969 | 6.28 % change on previous year | -237.4% |
| 1970 | 12.4 % change on previous year | +97.5% |
| 1971 | -19.93 % change on previous year | -260.7% |
| 1972 | 2.47 % change on previous year | -112.4% |
| 1973 | 8.18 % change on previous year | +231.3% |
| 1974 | -1.82 % change on previous year | -122.2% |
| 1975 | 11.4 % change on previous year | -727.5% |
| 1976 | 12.7 % change on previous year | +11.4% |
| 1977 | -11.79 % change on previous year | -192.8% |
| 1978 | 0.4852 % change on previous year | -104.1% |
| 1979 | -11.91 % change on previous year | -2554.8% |
| 1980 | -0.4872 % change on previous year | -95.9% |
| 1981 | -5.85 % change on previous year | +1100.8% |
| 1982 | 3.45 % change on previous year | -158.9% |
| 1983 | -3.88 % change on previous year | -212.7% |
| 1984 | 6.88 % change on previous year | -277.3% |
| 1985 | 2.37 % change on previous year | -65.6% |
| 1986 | 8.41 % change on previous year | +255.2% |
| 1987 | -0.6724 % change on previous year | -108.0% |
| 1988 | 2.21 % change on previous year | -429.3% |
| 1989 | 7.15 % change on previous year | +222.9% |
| 1990 | 1.52 % change on previous year | -78.7% |
| 1991 | -2.8 % change on previous year | -284.2% |
| 1992 | -6.34 % change on previous year | +126.5% |
| 1993 | -14.34 % change on previous year | +126.2% |
| 1994 | 11.96 % change on previous year | -183.4% |
| 1995 | 2.3 % change on previous year | -80.7% |
| 1996 | -5.78 % change on previous year | -351.0% |
| 1997 | 1.45 % change on previous year | -125.0% |
| 1998 | -12.84 % change on previous year | -987.6% |
| 1999 | 12.74 % change on previous year | -199.2% |
| 2000 | -0.6901 % change on previous year | -105.4% |
| 2001 | -1.17 % change on previous year | +70.1% |
| 2002 | 1.23 % change on previous year | -204.8% |
| 2003 | 0.4791 % change on previous year | -61.1% |
| 2004 | 5.41 % change on previous year | +1029.6% |
| 2005 | 0.2488 % change on previous year | -95.4% |
| 2006 | -3.4 % change on previous year | -1467.1% |
| 2007 | 2.43 % change on previous year | -171.4% |
| 2008 | 0.5814 % change on previous year | -76.1% |
| 2009 | 0.0567 % change on previous year | -90.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0396 % change on previous year | -30.0% |
| 2011 | -0.6058 % change on previous year | -1628.0% |
| 2012 | -1.2 % change on previous year | +98.4% |
| 2013 | -0.6573 % change on previous year | -45.3% |
| 2014 | -2.84 % change on previous year | +331.8% |
| 2015 | -3.45 % change on previous year | +21.4% |
| 2016 | 0.198 % change on previous year | -105.7% |
| 2017 | 1.82 % change on previous year | +816.9% |
| 2018 | 0.0182 % change on previous year | -99.0% |
| 2019 | -0.8124 % change on previous year | -4565.9% |
| 2020 | 0.5379 % change on previous year | -166.2% |
| 2021 | -0.2675 % change on previous year | -149.7% |
| 2022 | -3.05 % change on previous year | +1039.4% |
| 2023 | -6.08 % change on previous year | +99.5% |
| 2024 | -5.95 % change on previous year | -2.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6564 % change on previous year | -11.68 % change on previous year | 7.52 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 0.2189 % change on previous year | -19.93 % change on previous year | 12.7 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.96 % change on previous year | -5.85 % change on previous year | 8.41 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.21 % change on previous year | -14.34 % change on previous year | 12.74 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.5172 % change on previous year | -3.4 % change on previous year | 5.41 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.7491 % change on previous year | -3.45 % change on previous year | 1.82 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -2.96 % change on previous year | -6.08 % change on previous year | 0.5379 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 135 Republic of Korea -5.39 % change on previous year compare
- 136 Malawi -5.68 % change on previous year compare
- 137 Russian Federation -5.89 % change on previous year compare
- 139 Lithuania -6 % change on previous year compare
- 140 Georgia -6.25 % change on previous year compare
- 141 United Arab Emirates -6.41 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Philippines
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2488 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0859 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 358.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.0874 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4423 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 8.59 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 8.59 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Philippines?
- Tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Philippines was -5.95 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 12.74 % change on previous year in 1999.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was -19.93 % change on previous year in 1971.
- How does Philippines rank for tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate?
- Philippines ranks 138th out of 168 countries with data for 2024.
- Is tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 109.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.