Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Norway
Norway: Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate was 0 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
0 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 100.0%
World rank
85th
of 168 countries
All-time high
15.15 % change on previous year
in 2018
All-time low
-17.5 % change on previous year
in 1969
Years of data
63
1962–2024
Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Norway, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Norway is 0 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Norway peaked at 15.15 % change on previous year in 2018 and was at its lowest, -17.5 % change on previous year, in 1969.
That places Norway 85th out of 168 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Norway, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 1.35 % change on previous year | — |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1965 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 6.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1967 | 2.5 % change on previous year | -62.5% |
| 1968 | -2.44 % change on previous year | -197.6% |
| 1969 | -17.5 % change on previous year | +617.5% |
| 1970 | -4.55 % change on previous year | -74.0% |
| 1971 | 3.17 % change on previous year | -169.8% |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | -12.31 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1976 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1977 | 1.75 % change on previous year | — |
| 1978 | -1.72 % change on previous year | -198.3% |
| 1979 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1980 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1981 | -14.04 % change on previous year | — |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1983 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | 4.08 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | -13.73 % change on previous year | -436.3% |
| 1986 | 2.27 % change on previous year | -116.6% |
| 1987 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1988 | 4.44 % change on previous year | — |
| 1989 | -2.13 % change on previous year | -147.9% |
| 1990 | -15.22 % change on previous year | +615.2% |
| 1991 | -2.56 % change on previous year | -83.2% |
| 1992 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1993 | -7.89 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | -2.86 % change on previous year | -63.8% |
| 1995 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1996 | -2.94 % change on previous year | — |
| 1997 | -3.03 % change on previous year | +3.0% |
| 1998 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1999 | -3.12 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2001 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2002 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2003 | 3.23 % change on previous year | — |
| 2004 | 3.12 % change on previous year | -3.1% |
| 2005 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2006 | 3.03 % change on previous year | — |
| 2007 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2008 | 8.82 % change on previous year | — |
| 2009 | 2.7 % change on previous year | -69.4% |
| 2010 | -10.53 % change on previous year | -489.5% |
| 2011 | 5.88 % change on previous year | -155.9% |
| 2012 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2013 | 2.78 % change on previous year | — |
| 2014 | 2.7 % change on previous year | -2.7% |
| 2015 | -13.16 % change on previous year | -586.8% |
| 2016 | 6.06 % change on previous year | -146.1% |
| 2017 | -5.71 % change on previous year | -194.3% |
| 2018 | 15.15 % change on previous year | -365.2% |
| 2019 | 5.26 % change on previous year | -65.3% |
| 2020 | -2.5 % change on previous year | -147.5% |
| 2021 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2022 | -2.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 2023 | 5.26 % change on previous year | -305.3% |
| 2024 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.18 % change on previous year | -17.5 % change on previous year | 6.67 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | -1.36 % change on previous year | -12.31 % change on previous year | 3.17 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.91 % change on previous year | -14.04 % change on previous year | 4.44 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -3.76 % change on previous year | -15.22 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.09 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8.82 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.844 % change on previous year | -13.16 % change on previous year | 15.15 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0398 % change on previous year | -2.56 % change on previous year | 5.26 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Norway
- 82 Namibia 0.1407 % change on previous year compare
- 83 Algeria 0.0205 % change on previous year compare
- 84 Sudan 0.0106 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Austria 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Denmark 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Gabon 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Haiti 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Ireland 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Iceland 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Liberia 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Saint Lucia 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Maldives 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Tonga 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 French Guiana 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Cook Islands 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 % change on previous year compare
- 85 Brunei Darussalam 0 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Norway
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 2.39 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0164 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,553 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.7644 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1643 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 1.64 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 1.64 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Norway?
- Tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Norway was 0 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 15.15 % change on previous year in 2018.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was -17.5 % change on previous year in 1969.
- How does Norway rank for tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate?
- Norway ranks 85th out of 168 countries with data for 2024.
- Is tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate rising or falling in Norway?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.