Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile
Chile: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 40.81 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Chile recorded 40.81 % change on previous year for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in 2024.
The figure is up 484.6% on the previous year and up 601.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile peaked at 222.98 % change on previous year in 1981 and was at its lowest, -61.95 % change on previous year, in 1978.
That places Chile 11th out of 165 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 71.3 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 60.77 % change on previous year | -14.8% |
| 1964 | -11.35 % change on previous year | -118.7% |
| 1965 | 11.1 % change on previous year | -197.8% |
| 1966 | 12.58 % change on previous year | +13.4% |
| 1967 | 36.52 % change on previous year | +190.3% |
| 1968 | 9.03 % change on previous year | -75.3% |
| 1969 | -6.71 % change on previous year | -174.2% |
| 1970 | 55.27 % change on previous year | -924.2% |
| 1971 | -15.98 % change on previous year | -128.9% |
| 1972 | -13.6 % change on previous year | -14.9% |
| 1973 | -28.76 % change on previous year | +111.5% |
| 1974 | 19.78 % change on previous year | -168.8% |
| 1975 | 57.68 % change on previous year | +191.6% |
| 1976 | 40.79 % change on previous year | -29.3% |
| 1977 | -2.98 % change on previous year | -107.3% |
| 1978 | -61.95 % change on previous year | +1981.1% |
| 1979 | -21.28 % change on previous year | -65.6% |
| 1980 | -31.64 % change on previous year | +48.7% |
| 1981 | 222.98 % change on previous year | -804.7% |
| 1982 | -34.06 % change on previous year | -115.3% |
| 1983 | 70.59 % change on previous year | -307.2% |
| 1984 | 33.55 % change on previous year | -52.5% |
| 1985 | -3.17 % change on previous year | -109.5% |
| 1986 | 24.19 % change on previous year | -862.8% |
| 1987 | 0.4224 % change on previous year | -98.3% |
| 1988 | -6.12 % change on previous year | -1550.1% |
| 1989 | 12.96 % change on previous year | -311.7% |
| 1990 | -17.2 % change on previous year | -232.7% |
| 1991 | -7.59 % change on previous year | -55.8% |
| 1992 | 66.92 % change on previous year | -981.4% |
| 1993 | -4.95 % change on previous year | -107.4% |
| 1994 | 4 % change on previous year | -180.7% |
| 1995 | 5.55 % change on previous year | +38.8% |
| 1996 | -16.96 % change on previous year | -405.5% |
| 1997 | -12.93 % change on previous year | -23.8% |
| 1998 | 13.96 % change on previous year | -208.0% |
| 1999 | -1.23 % change on previous year | -108.8% |
| 2000 | 1.49 % change on previous year | -221.2% |
| 2001 | 4.52 % change on previous year | +204.5% |
| 2002 | 9.97 % change on previous year | +120.4% |
| 2003 | -38.73 % change on previous year | -488.3% |
| 2004 | 4.61 % change on previous year | -111.9% |
| 2005 | 14.02 % change on previous year | +204.0% |
| 2006 | -15.32 % change on previous year | -209.3% |
| 2007 | -25.7 % change on previous year | +67.8% |
| 2008 | -26.06 % change on previous year | +1.4% |
| 2009 | -13.74 % change on previous year | -47.3% |
| 2010 | 36.25 % change on previous year | -363.8% |
| 2011 | 37.37 % change on previous year | +3.1% |
| 2012 | -6.51 % change on previous year | -117.4% |
| 2013 | 3.38 % change on previous year | -151.9% |
| 2014 | -8.15 % change on previous year | -341.1% |
| 2015 | 19.51 % change on previous year | -339.5% |
| 2016 | -20.45 % change on previous year | -204.8% |
| 2017 | 7.52 % change on previous year | -136.8% |
| 2018 | 34.12 % change on previous year | +353.7% |
| 2019 | -44.69 % change on previous year | -231.0% |
| 2020 | -4.14 % change on previous year | -90.7% |
| 2021 | -40.73 % change on previous year | +884.7% |
| 2022 | -9.53 % change on previous year | -76.6% |
| 2023 | -10.61 % change on previous year | +11.3% |
| 2024 | 40.81 % change on previous year | -484.6% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1978 | -1981.1% | -2.98 % change on previous year | -61.95 % change on previous year |
| 1988 | -1550.1% | 0.4224 % change on previous year | -6.12 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22.9 % change on previous year | -11.35 % change on previous year | 71.3 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 2.9 % change on previous year | -61.95 % change on previous year | 57.68 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 28.97 % change on previous year | -34.06 % change on previous year | 222.98 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.96 % change on previous year | -17.2 % change on previous year | 66.92 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -8.49 % change on previous year | -38.73 % change on previous year | 14.02 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.83 % change on previous year | -44.69 % change on previous year | 37.37 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -4.84 % change on previous year | -40.73 % change on previous year | 40.81 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 8 Finland 58.37 % change on previous year compare
- 9 Kyrgyzstan 54.17 % change on previous year compare
- 10 Rwanda 53.24 % change on previous year compare
- 12 Belgium-Luxembourg 32.53 % change on previous year compare
- 13 Greece 28.57 % change on previous year compare
- 14 Austria 28.37 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile?
- Sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile was 40.81 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 222.98 % change on previous year in 1981.
- What is the lowest sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -61.95 % change on previous year in 1978.
- How does Chile rank for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Chile ranks 11th out of 165 countries with data for 2024.
- Is sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 601.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.