Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Singapore
Singapore: Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1992. ◆ Volatile
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Singapore, 1961–1992
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 1992, sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Singapore stood at 0 ha per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 32 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Singapore peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1972 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 1961.
That places Singapore 123rd out of 136 countries with data for 1992, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Singapore, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1963 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1964 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1965 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1966 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1967 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 1968 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -27.6% |
| 1969 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 1970 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 1971 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +154.5% |
| 1972 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +84.9% |
| 1973 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -48.5% |
| 1974 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -44.4% |
| 1975 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 1976 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +24.7% |
| 1977 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 1978 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -28.9% |
| 1979 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -23.0% |
| 1980 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -21.9% |
| 1981 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -28.7% |
| 1982 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.1% |
| 1983 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -40.5% |
| 1984 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -34.2% |
| 1985 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -45.7% |
| 1986 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -53.6% |
| 1987 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -70.4% |
| 1988 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1989 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -44.5% |
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 3 |
Countries ranked near Singapore
- 120 Palestine, State of 0 ha per US$ of GDP
- 121 Djibouti 0 ha per US$ of GDP
- 122 Greece 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 123 Antigua and Barbuda 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 123 Bulgaria 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 123 Cyprus 0 ha per US$ of GDP
- 123 Algeria 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 123 Estonia 0 ha per US$ of GDP
- 123 Georgia 0 ha per US$ of GDP
- 123 Ireland 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 123 Israel 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 123 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 123 Latvia 0 ha per US$ of GDP
- 123 Malta 0 ha per US$ of GDP
- 123 Portugal 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 123 Yemen 0 ha per US$ of GDP
More agriculture & rural data for Singapore
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -1.4 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 24.33 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.2% (2024)
- Rural population 0.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Singapore?
- Sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Singapore was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1992, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1972.
- What is the lowest sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- How does Singapore rank for sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Singapore ranks 123rd out of 136 countries with data for 1992.
- Is sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.