Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico: Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2002. ◆ Volatile
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Puerto Rico, 1961–2002
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Puerto Rico recorded 0 ha per US$ of GDP for sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp in 2002.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 222.1% on the previous year and down 93.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Puerto Rico peaked at 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2001.
Puerto Rico ranks 101st of 136 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Puerto Rico, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1964 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1965 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 1966 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 1967 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.3% |
| 1968 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -19.3% |
| 1969 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -32.9% |
| 1970 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1971 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -25.2% |
| 1972 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 1973 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -20.0% |
| 1974 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 1975 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 1976 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 1977 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -16.0% |
| 1978 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -27.8% |
| 1979 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 1980 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -20.0% |
| 1981 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 1982 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -31.7% |
| 1983 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 1984 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1985 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1986 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 1987 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 1988 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 1989 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -20.4% |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -22.1% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -26.0% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.3% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -41.7% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -37.0% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -16.7% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -86.6% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +222.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 3 |
Countries ranked near Puerto Rico
More agriculture & rural data for Puerto Rico
- Rural population, per capita 0.0566 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 0.4415 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 278.57 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.05 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population 180,246 (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.7% (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 887.20 million current US$ (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Puerto Rico?
- Sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Puerto Rico was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2002, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Puerto Rico?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Puerto Rico?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2001.
- How does Puerto Rico rank for sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Puerto Rico ranks 101st out of 136 countries with data for 2002.
- Is sugar crops primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Puerto Rico?
- Over the last ten years it is down 93.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Puerto Rico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.