Sugar cane — Gross Production Value in Pakistan
Pakistan: Sugar cane — Gross Production Value was 3.78 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Sugar cane — Gross Production Value in Pakistan, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for sugar cane — gross production value in Pakistan is 3.78 million 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 3.9% on the previous year and up 34.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sugar cane — gross production value in Pakistan peaked at 3.98 million 1000 Int$ in 2021 and was at its lowest, 522,456 1000 Int$, in 1961.
Pakistan ranks 5th of 103 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Sugar cane — Gross Production Value in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 522,456 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 644,394 1000 Int$ | +23.3% |
| 1963 | 827,581 1000 Int$ | +28.4% |
| 1964 | 724,391 1000 Int$ | -12.5% |
| 1965 | 837,860 1000 Int$ | +15.7% |
| 1966 | 1.00 million 1000 Int$ | +19.5% |
| 1967 | 986,661 1000 Int$ | -1.5% |
| 1968 | 837,501 1000 Int$ | -15.1% |
| 1969 | 986,158 1000 Int$ | +17.8% |
| 1970 | 1.18 million 1000 Int$ | +20.0% |
| 1971 | 1.04 million 1000 Int$ | -12.1% |
| 1972 | 896,048 1000 Int$ | -13.8% |
| 1973 | 895,316 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1974 | 1.07 million 1000 Int$ | +19.9% |
| 1975 | 953,437 1000 Int$ | -11.2% |
| 1976 | 1.15 million 1000 Int$ | +20.3% |
| 1977 | 1.33 million 1000 Int$ | +15.6% |
| 1978 | 1.35 million 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1979 | 1.23 million 1000 Int$ | -9.1% |
| 1980 | 1.23 million 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1981 | 1.45 million 1000 Int$ | +17.7% |
| 1982 | 1.64 million 1000 Int$ | +13.0% |
| 1983 | 1.46 million 1000 Int$ | -11.1% |
| 1984 | 1.54 million 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 1985 | 1.44 million 1000 Int$ | -6.3% |
| 1986 | 1.25 million 1000 Int$ | -13.3% |
| 1987 | 1.96 million 1000 Int$ | +56.5% |
| 1988 | 1.48 million 1000 Int$ | -24.3% |
| 1989 | 1.66 million 1000 Int$ | +12.0% |
| 1990 | 1.59 million 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 1991 | 1.62 million 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1992 | 1.74 million 1000 Int$ | +8.0% |
| 1993 | 1.71 million 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1994 | 1.99 million 1000 Int$ | +16.7% |
| 1995 | 2.12 million 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 1996 | 2.03 million 1000 Int$ | -4.1% |
| 1997 | 1.89 million 1000 Int$ | -7.1% |
| 1998 | 2.38 million 1000 Int$ | +26.4% |
| 1999 | 2.48 million 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 2000 | 2.08 million 1000 Int$ | -16.1% |
| 2001 | 1.96 million 1000 Int$ | -5.9% |
| 2002 | 2.16 million 1000 Int$ | +10.2% |
| 2003 | 2.34 million 1000 Int$ | +8.4% |
| 2004 | 2.42 million 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 2005 | 2.12 million 1000 Int$ | -12.2% |
| 2006 | 2.00 million 1000 Int$ | -5.5% |
| 2007 | 2.46 million 1000 Int$ | +22.6% |
| 2008 | 2.87 million 1000 Int$ | +16.8% |
| 2009 | 2.25 million 1000 Int$ | -21.7% |
| 2010 | 2.22 million 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 2011 | 2.48 million 1000 Int$ | +12.0% |
| 2012 | 2.62 million 1000 Int$ | +5.6% |
| 2013 | 3.03 million 1000 Int$ | +15.5% |
| 2014 | 2.82 million 1000 Int$ | -6.9% |
| 2015 | 2.94 million 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 2016 | 3.39 million 1000 Int$ | +15.3% |
| 2017 | 3.74 million 1000 Int$ | +10.4% |
| 2018 | 3.02 million 1000 Int$ | -19.4% |
| 2019 | 2.98 million 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 2020 | 3.64 million 1000 Int$ | +22.0% |
| 2021 | 3.98 million 1000 Int$ | +9.4% |
| 2022 | 3.95 million 1000 Int$ | -0.8% |
| 2023 | 3.93 million 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 2024 | 3.78 million 1000 Int$ | -3.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 818,706 1000 Int$ | 522,456 1000 Int$ | 1.00 million 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.11 million 1000 Int$ | 895,316 1000 Int$ | 1.35 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.51 million 1000 Int$ | 1.23 million 1000 Int$ | 1.96 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.95 million 1000 Int$ | 1.59 million 1000 Int$ | 2.48 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.26 million 1000 Int$ | 1.96 million 1000 Int$ | 2.87 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.92 million 1000 Int$ | 2.22 million 1000 Int$ | 3.74 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.86 million 1000 Int$ | 3.64 million 1000 Int$ | 3.98 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
More agriculture & rural data for Pakistan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 6.28 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2302 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 367.4 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.984 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6047 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 23.02 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 23.02 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 4.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sugar cane — gross production value in Pakistan?
- Sugar cane — gross production value in Pakistan was 3.78 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sugar cane — gross production value recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.98 million 1000 Int$ in 2021.
- What is the lowest sugar cane — gross production value recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 522,456 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Pakistan rank for sugar cane — gross production value?
- Pakistan ranks 5th out of 103 countries with data for 2024.
- Is sugar cane — gross production value rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 34.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sugar cane — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.