Sugar cane — Gross Production Value in Malaysia
Malaysia: Sugar cane — Gross Production Value was 760 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Sugar cane — Gross Production Value in Malaysia, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, sugar cane — gross production value in Malaysia stood at 760 1000 Int$.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.8% on the previous year and up 84.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sugar cane — gross production value in Malaysia peaked at 71,878 1000 Int$ in 1995 and was at its lowest, 411 1000 Int$, in 2014.
That places Malaysia 85th out of 103 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sugar cane — Gross Production Value in Malaysia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1,436 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 1,616 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1963 | 1,661 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1964 | 1,750 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 1965 | 1,840 1000 Int$ | +5.1% |
| 1966 | 2,110 1000 Int$ | +14.7% |
| 1967 | 2,154 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 1968 | 2,424 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1969 | 2,603 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1970 | 3,187 1000 Int$ | +22.4% |
| 1971 | 4,623 1000 Int$ | +45.1% |
| 1972 | 10,009 1000 Int$ | +116.5% |
| 1973 | 18,268 1000 Int$ | +82.5% |
| 1974 | 25,809 1000 Int$ | +41.3% |
| 1975 | 35,953 1000 Int$ | +39.3% |
| 1976 | 39,050 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 1977 | 44,885 1000 Int$ | +14.9% |
| 1978 | 43,224 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 1979 | 45,109 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 1980 | 32,317 1000 Int$ | -28.4% |
| 1981 | 30,521 1000 Int$ | -5.6% |
| 1982 | 44,211 1000 Int$ | +44.9% |
| 1983 | 46,007 1000 Int$ | +4.1% |
| 1984 | 49,373 1000 Int$ | +7.3% |
| 1985 | 48,475 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 1986 | 54,714 1000 Int$ | +12.9% |
| 1987 | 54,176 1000 Int$ | -1.0% |
| 1988 | 51,168 1000 Int$ | -5.6% |
| 1989 | 54,580 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 1990 | 58,350 1000 Int$ | +6.9% |
| 1991 | 54,759 1000 Int$ | -6.2% |
| 1992 | 59,248 1000 Int$ | +8.2% |
| 1993 | 69,452 1000 Int$ | +17.2% |
| 1994 | 69,165 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 1995 | 71,878 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 1996 | 71,815 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1997 | 71,815 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 71,815 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 71,815 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 49,373 1000 Int$ | -31.2% |
| 2001 | 44,885 1000 Int$ | -9.1% |
| 2002 | 44,885 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 29,175 1000 Int$ | -35.0% |
| 2004 | 22,442 1000 Int$ | -23.1% |
| 2005 | 22,442 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 20,198 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 2007 | 23,340 1000 Int$ | +15.6% |
| 2008 | 22,442 1000 Int$ | -3.8% |
| 2009 | 15,710 1000 Int$ | -30.0% |
| 2010 | 9,008 1000 Int$ | -42.7% |
| 2011 | 8,711 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 2012 | 6,561 1000 Int$ | -24.7% |
| 2013 | 4,438 1000 Int$ | -32.4% |
| 2014 | 411 1000 Int$ | -90.7% |
| 2015 | 1,359 1000 Int$ | +230.7% |
| 2016 | 1,258 1000 Int$ | -7.4% |
| 2017 | 1,346 1000 Int$ | +7.0% |
| 2018 | 1,054 1000 Int$ | -21.7% |
| 2019 | 932 1000 Int$ | -11.6% |
| 2020 | 1,056 1000 Int$ | +13.3% |
| 2021 | 1,149 1000 Int$ | +8.8% |
| 2022 | 1,124 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 2023 | 914 1000 Int$ | -18.7% |
| 2024 | 760 1000 Int$ | -16.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,955 1000 Int$ | 1,436 1000 Int$ | 2,603 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 27,012 1000 Int$ | 3,187 1000 Int$ | 45,109 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 46,554 1000 Int$ | 30,521 1000 Int$ | 54,714 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 67,011 1000 Int$ | 54,759 1000 Int$ | 71,878 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 29,489 1000 Int$ | 15,710 1000 Int$ | 49,373 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 3,508 1000 Int$ | 411 1000 Int$ | 9,008 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,001 1000 Int$ | 760 1000 Int$ | 1,149 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Malaysia
- 82 Afghanistan 2,394 1000 Int$ compare
- 83 Puerto Rico 1,795 1000 Int$ compare
- 84 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1,077 1000 Int$ compare
- 86 Saint Lucia 449 1000 Int$ compare
- 87 Guinea-Bissau 315 1000 Int$ compare
- 88 Iraq 314 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Malaysia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 13.04 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0822 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,078 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.913 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2261 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 8.22 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 8.22 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sugar cane — gross production value in Malaysia?
- Sugar cane — gross production value in Malaysia was 760 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sugar cane — gross production value recorded in Malaysia?
- The highest recorded value was 71,878 1000 Int$ in 1995.
- What is the lowest sugar cane — gross production value recorded in Malaysia?
- The lowest recorded value was 411 1000 Int$ in 2014.
- How does Malaysia rank for sugar cane — gross production value?
- Malaysia ranks 85th out of 103 countries with data for 2024.
- Is sugar cane — gross production value rising or falling in Malaysia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 84.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Malaysia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sugar cane — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.