Statizoid

Sugar & Sweeteners β€” Residuals in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Sugar & Sweeteners β€” Residuals was -84 1000 t in 2023. β—† Volatile

Latest (2023)
-84 1000 t
Change on year
down 109.1%
Rank
5th
of 10 groups
All-time high
924 1000 t
in 2022
All-time low
-160 1000 t
in 2019
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Sugar & Sweeteners β€” Residuals in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), 2010–2023

-25002505007501.0k2010201620232010: 12 1000 t2011: 16 1000 t2012: -2 1000 t2013: -12 1000 t2014: 17 1000 t2015: 436 1000 t2016: 398 1000 t2017: 529 1000 t2018: 481 1000 t2019: -160 1000 t2020: 517 1000 t2021: 847 1000 t2022: 924 1000 t2023: -84 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for sugar & sweeteners β€” residuals in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) is -84 1000 t, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 109.1% on the previous year and down 600.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sugar & sweeteners β€” residuals in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) peaked at 924 1000 t in 2022 and was at its lowest, -160 1000 t, in 2019.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 171.5 1000 t -160 1000 t 529 1000 t 10
2020s 551 1000 t -84 1000 t 924 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

  1. 2 Djibouti 13 1000 t compare
  2. 3 Kiribati 3 1000 t compare
  3. 4 Tajikistan, Republic of 1 1000 t compare
  4. 5 Tuvalu 0 1000 t compare
  5. 5 Naoero, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  6. 5 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  7. 5 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 0 1000 t compare
  8. 5 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
  9. 5 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  10. 5 Bahrain, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  11. 5 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  12. 5 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  13. 5 Comoros, Union of the 0 1000 t compare
  14. 5 SΓ£o TomΓ© and PrΓ­ncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  15. 5 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  16. 5 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  17. 5 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  18. 5 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  19. 5 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  20. 5 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  21. 5 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  22. 5 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  23. 5 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  24. 5 Uzbekistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  25. 5 Armenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  26. 5 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  27. 5 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  28. 5 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
  29. 5 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  30. 5 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  31. 5 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  32. 5 North Macedonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  33. 5 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  34. 5 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  35. 5 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  36. 5 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  37. 5 Bahamas, The 0 1000 t compare
  38. 5 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  39. 5 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  40. 5 St. Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  41. 5 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  42. 5 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  43. 5 Kyrgyz Republic 0 1000 t compare
  44. 5 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  45. 5 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  46. 5 Croatia 0 1000 t compare
  47. 5 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  48. 5 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  49. 5 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  50. 5 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  51. 5 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  52. 5 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  53. 5 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  54. 5 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  55. 5 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  56. 5 Gambia, The 0 1000 t compare
  57. 5 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  58. 5 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  59. 5 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  60. 5 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  61. 5 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  62. 5 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  63. 5 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
  64. 5 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  65. 5 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  66. 5 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
  67. 5 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  68. 5 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  69. 5 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  70. 5 Congo, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  71. 5 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  72. 5 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  73. 5 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  74. 5 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  75. 5 Belarus, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  76. 5 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  77. 5 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  78. 5 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  79. 5 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  80. 5 Serbia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  81. 5 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  82. 5 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  83. 5 Fiji, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  84. 5 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  85. 5 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  86. 5 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  87. 5 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  88. 5 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  89. 5 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  90. 5 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  91. 5 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  92. 5 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  93. 5 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  94. 5 Niger 0 1000 t compare
  95. 5 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  96. 5 Yemen, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  97. 5 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  98. 5 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  99. 5 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  100. 5 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  101. 5 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  102. 5 Madagascar, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  103. 5 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  104. 5 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  105. 5 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  106. 5 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  107. 5 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  108. 5 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  109. 5 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  110. 5 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  111. 5 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  112. 5 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  113. 5 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  114. 5 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  115. 5 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  116. 5 Mozambique, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  117. 5 India 0 1000 t compare
  118. 5 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  119. 5 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
  120. 5 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  121. 5 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  122. 5 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  123. 5 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  124. 5 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  125. 5 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  126. 5 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  127. 5 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  128. 5 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  129. 5 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  130. 5 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  131. 5 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  132. 5 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  133. 5 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  134. 5 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  135. 5 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  136. 5 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  137. 5 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  138. 5 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  139. 5 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  140. 5 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  141. 5 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  142. 5 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 213 places β†’

More agriculture & rural data for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

All data for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is sugar & sweeteners β€” residuals in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Sugar & sweeteners β€” residuals in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) was -84 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sugar & sweeteners β€” residuals recorded in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 924 1000 t in 2022.
What is the lowest sugar & sweeteners β€” residuals recorded in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -160 1000 t in 2019.
How does Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank for sugar & sweeteners β€” residuals?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th out of 10 groups with data for 2023.
Is sugar & sweeteners β€” residuals rising or falling in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is down 600.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sugar & Sweeteners β€” Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sugar & Sweeteners β€” Residuals in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-and-sweeteners-residuals/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-and-sweeteners-residuals/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Sugar & Sweeteners β€” Residuals in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar & Sweeteners β€” Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,901 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.