Sorghum — Gross Production Value in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Sorghum — Gross Production Value was 17,827 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▼ Falling
Sorghum — Gross Production Value in Zimbabwe, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Zimbabwe recorded 17,827 1000 Int$ for sorghum — gross production value in 2024.
That represents a change of up 5.3% on the previous year and down 20.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sorghum — gross production value in Zimbabwe peaked at 42,362 1000 Int$ in 1967 and was at its lowest, 4,695 1000 Int$, in 2002.
Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 110 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 62 years of available data.
Sorghum — Gross Production Value in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 13,990 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 14,120 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 1963 | 11,948 1000 Int$ | -15.4% |
| 1964 | 11,948 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 11,296 1000 Int$ | -5.5% |
| 1966 | 21,723 1000 Int$ | +92.3% |
| 1967 | 42,362 1000 Int$ | +95.0% |
| 1968 | 8,275 1000 Int$ | -80.5% |
| 1969 | 32,139 1000 Int$ | +288.4% |
| 1970 | 15,687 1000 Int$ | -51.2% |
| 1971 | 31,495 1000 Int$ | +100.8% |
| 1972 | 30,423 1000 Int$ | -3.4% |
| 1973 | 11,000 1000 Int$ | -63.8% |
| 1974 | 35,636 1000 Int$ | +224.0% |
| 1975 | 24,015 1000 Int$ | -32.6% |
| 1976 | 29,601 1000 Int$ | +23.3% |
| 1977 | 11,122 1000 Int$ | -62.4% |
| 1978 | 15,896 1000 Int$ | +42.9% |
| 1979 | 10,619 1000 Int$ | -33.2% |
| 1980 | 17,878 1000 Int$ | +68.4% |
| 1981 | 27,182 1000 Int$ | +52.0% |
| 1982 | 14,632 1000 Int$ | -46.2% |
| 1983 | 11,195 1000 Int$ | -23.5% |
| 1984 | 12,059 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 1985 | 28,892 1000 Int$ | +139.6% |
| 1986 | 28,501 1000 Int$ | -1.4% |
| 1987 | 12,099 1000 Int$ | -57.5% |
| 1988 | 38,149 1000 Int$ | +215.3% |
| 1989 | 17,202 1000 Int$ | -54.9% |
| 1990 | 20,131 1000 Int$ | +17.0% |
| 1991 | 14,789 1000 Int$ | -26.5% |
| 1992 | 6,300 1000 Int$ | -57.4% |
| 1993 | 20,924 1000 Int$ | +232.1% |
| 1994 | 11,431 1000 Int$ | -45.4% |
| 1995 | 8,328 1000 Int$ | -27.1% |
| 1996 | 19,598 1000 Int$ | +135.3% |
| 1997 | 13,996 1000 Int$ | -28.6% |
| 1998 | 8,505 1000 Int$ | -39.2% |
| 1999 | 12,498 1000 Int$ | +46.9% |
| 2000 | 10,059 1000 Int$ | -19.5% |
| 2001 | 12,243 1000 Int$ | +21.7% |
| 2002 | 4,695 1000 Int$ | -61.7% |
| 2003 | 15,479 1000 Int$ | +229.7% |
| 2004 | 34,419 1000 Int$ | +122.4% |
| 2005 | 10,566 1000 Int$ | -69.3% |
| 2006 | 25,683 1000 Int$ | +143.1% |
| 2007 | 20,978 1000 Int$ | -18.3% |
| 2010 | 16,005 1000 Int$ | -23.7% |
| 2011 | 10,981 1000 Int$ | -31.4% |
| 2012 | 9,633 1000 Int$ | -12.3% |
| 2013 | 15,106 1000 Int$ | +56.8% |
| 2014 | 22,542 1000 Int$ | +49.2% |
| 2015 | 7,669 1000 Int$ | -66.0% |
| 2016 | 7,887 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 2017 | 11,897 1000 Int$ | +50.8% |
| 2018 | 16,363 1000 Int$ | +37.5% |
| 2019 | 14,398 1000 Int$ | -12.0% |
| 2020 | 31,076 1000 Int$ | +115.8% |
| 2021 | 28,003 1000 Int$ | -9.9% |
| 2022 | 17,858 1000 Int$ | -36.2% |
| 2023 | 16,924 1000 Int$ | -5.2% |
| 2024 | 17,827 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,645 1000 Int$ | 8,275 1000 Int$ | 42,362 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 21,549 1000 Int$ | 10,619 1000 Int$ | 35,636 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 20,779 1000 Int$ | 11,195 1000 Int$ | 38,149 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 13,650 1000 Int$ | 6,300 1000 Int$ | 20,924 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 16,765 1000 Int$ | 4,695 1000 Int$ | 34,419 1000 Int$ | 8 |
| 2010s | 13,248 1000 Int$ | 7,669 1000 Int$ | 22,542 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 22,338 1000 Int$ | 16,924 1000 Int$ | 31,076 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 39 El Salvador 21,506 1000 Int$ compare
- 40 South Africa 21,289 1000 Int$ compare
- 41 USSR 20,963 1000 Int$ compare
- 43 Uruguay 14,128 1000 Int$ compare
- 44 Guinea 14,120 1000 Int$ compare
- 45 Sierra Leone 13,034 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 34.41 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0947 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 286.19 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.8815 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.595 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 9.47 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 9.47 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sorghum — gross production value in Zimbabwe?
- Sorghum — gross production value in Zimbabwe was 17,827 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sorghum — gross production value recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 42,362 1000 Int$ in 1967.
- What is the lowest sorghum — gross production value recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 4,695 1000 Int$ in 2002.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for sorghum — gross production value?
- Zimbabwe ranks 42nd out of 110 countries with data for 2024.
- Is sorghum — gross production value rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sorghum — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.