Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value was 56,022 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
56,022 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.2%
Rank
3rd
of 15 groups
All-time high
194,396 1000 Int$
in 1964
All-time low
29,145 1000 Int$
in 1998
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) recorded 56,022 1000 Int$ for sisal, raw — gross production value in 2024.
That represents a change of down 0.2% on the previous year and up 22.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sisal, raw — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 194,396 1000 Int$ in 1964 and was at its lowest, 29,145 1000 Int$, in 1998.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 166,222 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 176,291 1000 Int$ | +6.1% |
| 1963 | 185,754 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 1964 | 194,396 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1965 | 185,020 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 1966 | 181,793 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 1967 | 172,503 1000 Int$ | -5.1% |
| 1968 | 159,202 1000 Int$ | -7.7% |
| 1969 | 166,326 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1970 | 156,487 1000 Int$ | -5.9% |
| 1971 | 144,174 1000 Int$ | -7.9% |
| 1972 | 132,789 1000 Int$ | -7.9% |
| 1973 | 140,022 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 1974 | 147,321 1000 Int$ | +5.2% |
| 1975 | 113,966 1000 Int$ | -22.6% |
| 1976 | 100,451 1000 Int$ | -11.9% |
| 1977 | 93,397 1000 Int$ | -7.0% |
| 1978 | 80,540 1000 Int$ | -13.8% |
| 1979 | 76,816 1000 Int$ | -4.6% |
| 1980 | 87,765 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1981 | 74,697 1000 Int$ | -14.9% |
| 1982 | 72,230 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 1983 | 64,509 1000 Int$ | -10.7% |
| 1984 | 61,556 1000 Int$ | -4.6% |
| 1985 | 54,858 1000 Int$ | -10.9% |
| 1986 | 49,138 1000 Int$ | -10.4% |
| 1987 | 48,359 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 1988 | 50,250 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 1989 | 50,196 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1990 | 52,099 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1991 | 49,375 1000 Int$ | -5.2% |
| 1992 | 39,231 1000 Int$ | -20.5% |
| 1993 | 46,477 1000 Int$ | +18.5% |
| 1994 | 42,787 1000 Int$ | -7.9% |
| 1995 | 42,052 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 1996 | 37,500 1000 Int$ | -10.8% |
| 1997 | 39,020 1000 Int$ | +4.1% |
| 1998 | 29,145 1000 Int$ | -25.3% |
| 1999 | 33,077 1000 Int$ | +13.5% |
| 2000 | 30,636 1000 Int$ | -7.4% |
| 2001 | 33,159 1000 Int$ | +8.2% |
| 2002 | 35,206 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 2003 | 35,771 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2004 | 36,384 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 2005 | 38,401 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 2006 | 39,213 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 2007 | 41,055 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 2008 | 40,953 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 2009 | 34,973 1000 Int$ | -14.6% |
| 2010 | 38,828 1000 Int$ | +11.0% |
| 2011 | 40,045 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 2012 | 40,810 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2013 | 44,984 1000 Int$ | +10.2% |
| 2014 | 45,834 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2015 | 45,536 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 47,679 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 2017 | 44,429 1000 Int$ | -6.8% |
| 2018 | 47,423 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 2019 | 45,097 1000 Int$ | -4.9% |
| 2020 | 48,677 1000 Int$ | +7.9% |
| 2021 | 49,277 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2022 | 53,183 1000 Int$ | +7.9% |
| 2023 | 56,115 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 2024 | 56,022 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 176,390 1000 Int$ | 159,202 1000 Int$ | 194,396 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 118,596 1000 Int$ | 76,816 1000 Int$ | 156,487 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 61,356 1000 Int$ | 48,359 1000 Int$ | 87,765 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 41,076 1000 Int$ | 29,145 1000 Int$ | 52,099 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 36,575 1000 Int$ | 30,636 1000 Int$ | 41,055 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 44,066 1000 Int$ | 38,828 1000 Int$ | 47,679 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 52,655 1000 Int$ | 48,677 1000 Int$ | 56,115 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- 1 Brazil 45,955 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 Kenya 10,318 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 United Republic of Tanzania 30,164 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Madagascar 8,669 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 China 7,044 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 China, mainland 7,042 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 1,530 1000 Int$ compare
- 6 Haiti 5,971 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Fruit Primary — Production, annual growth rate 2.35 % change on previous year (2024)
- Milk, Total — Production, annual growth rate 3.02 % change on previous year (2024)
- Milk, Total — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 1.84 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat, Total — Production, annual growth rate 3.87 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate 1.94 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat, Poultry — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate 2.48 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat, Poultry — Production, annual growth rate 5.22 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat, Poultry — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 2.65 % change on previous year (2024)
- Swine / pigs — Stocks, annual growth rate 5.21 % change on previous year (2024)
- Eggs Primary — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 1.22 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sisal, raw — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Sisal, raw — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 56,022 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sisal, raw — gross production value recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 194,396 1000 Int$ in 1964.
- What is the lowest sisal, raw — gross production value recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 29,145 1000 Int$ in 1998.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for sisal, raw — gross production value?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 3rd out of 15 groups with data for 2024.
- Is sisal, raw — gross production value rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 22.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.