Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production in Poland

Poland: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production was 0 t in 2004. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2004)
0 t
World rank
27th
of 31 countries
All-time high
89 t
in 1970
All-time low
0 t
in 1996
Years of data
44
1961–2004

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production in Poland, 1961–2004

0204060801961198220041961: 78 t1962: 61 t1963: 43 t1964: 51 t1965: 40 t1966: 40 t1967: 42 t1968: 43 t1969: 69 t1970: 89 t1971: 80 t1972: 64 t1973: 52 t1974: 38 t1975: 41 t1976: 39 t1977: 35 t1978: 31 t1979: 34 t1980: 33 t1981: 29 t1982: 25 t1983: 27 t1984: 30 t1985: 33 t1986: 33 t1987: 21 t1988: 21 t1989: 13 t1990: 7 t1991: 2 t1992: 0.7 t1993: 1 t1994: 1 t1995: 1 t1996: 0 t1997: 0 t1998: 0 t1999: 0 t2000: 0 t2001: 0 t2002: 0 t2003: 0 t2004: 0 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

Poland recorded 0 t for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production in 2004. That is the lowest value across all 44 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production in Poland peaked at 89 t in 1970 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1996.

Poland ranks 27th of 31 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production in Poland, 1961 to 2004.
Year t Change
1961 78 t —
1962 61 t -21.8%
1963 43 t -29.5%
1964 51 t +18.6%
1965 40 t -21.6%
1966 40 t +0.0%
1967 42 t +5.0%
1968 43 t +2.4%
1969 69 t +60.5%
1970 89 t +29.0%
1971 80 t -10.1%
1972 64 t -20.0%
1973 52 t -18.8%
1974 38 t -26.9%
1975 41 t +7.9%
1976 39 t -4.9%
1977 35 t -10.3%
1978 31 t -11.4%
1979 34 t +9.7%
1980 33 t -2.9%
1981 29 t -12.1%
1982 25 t -13.8%
1983 27 t +8.0%
1984 30 t +11.1%
1985 33 t +10.0%
1986 33 t +0.0%
1987 21 t -36.4%
1988 21 t +0.0%
1989 13 t -38.1%
1990 7 t -46.2%
1991 2 t -71.4%
1992 0.7 t -65.0%
1993 1 t +42.9%
1994 1 t +0.0%
1995 1 t +0.0%
1996 0 t -100.0%
1997 0 t —
1998 0 t —
1999 0 t —
2000 0 t —
2001 0 t —
2002 0 t —
2003 0 t —
2004 0 t —

Poland compared with similar countries

  • Poland's 0 t is below the median for high income countries, which is 18.31 t. (9 countries reporting)
  • Poland's 0 t is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 103.61 t. (12 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 51.89 t 40 t 78 t 9
1970s 50.3 t 31 t 89 t 10
1980s 26.5 t 13 t 33 t 10
1990s 1.27 t 0 t 7 t 10
2000s 0 t 0 t 0 t 5

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 24 Egypt 7.43 t compare
  2. 25 Nepal 4 t compare
  3. 26 China, Taiwan Province of 2.02 t compare
  4. 27 Djibouti 0 t compare
  5. 27 France 0 t compare
  6. 27 Hungary 0 t compare
  7. 27 Myanmar 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 57 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production in Poland?
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production in Poland was 0 t in 2004, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 89 t in 1970.
What is the lowest silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1996.
How does Poland rank for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production?
Poland ranks 27th out of 31 countries with data for 2004.
Is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — production rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-production-2/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-production-2/poland/">Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
57 places, 3,034 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crop and livestock statistics are recorded for 278 products, covering the following categories: 1) CROPS PRIMARY: Cereals, Citrus Fruit, Fibre Crops, Fruit, Oil Crops, Oil Crops and Cakes in Oil Equivalent, Pulses, Roots and Tubers, Sugar Crops, Treenuts and Vegetables. Data are expressed in terms of area harvested, production quantity and yield. Cereals: Area and production data on cereals relate to crops harvested for dry grain only. Cereal crops harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed or silage or used for grazing are therefore excluded. 2) CROPS PROCESSED: Beer of barley; Cotton lint; Cottonseed; Margarine, short; Molasses; Oil, coconut (copra); Oil, cottonseed; Oil, groundnut; Oil, linseed; Oil, maize; Oil, olive, virgin; Oil, palm; Oil, palm kernel; Oil, rapeseed; Oil, safflower; Oil, sesame; Oil, soybean; Oil, sunflower; Palm kernels; Sugar Raw Centrifugal; Wine. 3) LIVE ANIMALS: Animals live n.e.s.; Asses; Beehives; Buffaloes; Camelids, other; Camels; Cattle; Chickens; Ducks; Geese and guinea fowls; Goats; Horses; Mules; Pigeons, other birds; Pigs; Rabbits and hares; Rodents, other; Sheep; Turkeys. 4) LIVESTOCK PRIMARY: Beeswax; Eggs (various types); Hides buffalo, fresh; Hides, cattle, fresh; Honey, natural; Meat (ass, bird nes, buffalo, camel, cattle, chicken, duck, game, goat, goose and guinea fowl, horse, mule, Meat nes, meat other camelids, Meat other rodents, pig, rabbit, sheep, turkey); Milk (buffalo, camel, cow, goat, sheep); Offals, nes; Silk-worm cocoons, reelable; Skins (goat, sheep); Snails, not sea; Wool, greasy. 5) LIVESTOCK PROCESSED: Butter (of milk from sheep, goat, buffalo, cow); Cheese (of milk from goat, buffalo, sheep, cow milk); Cheese of skimmed cow milk; Cream fresh; Ghee (cow and buffalo milk); Lard; Milk (dry buttermilk, skimmed condensed, skimmed cow, skimmed dried, skimmed evaporated, whole condensed, whole dried, whole evaporated); Silk raw; Tallow; Whey (condensed and dry); Yoghurt.