How does Cambodia rank for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value?

Cambodia ranks 3rd out of 19 countries with data for 2024.

Is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value rising or falling in Cambodia?

Over the last ten years it is up 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Cambodia

Name: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Cambodia
Creator: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)

Cambodia: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value was 2.88 million 1000 SLC in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)

2.88 million 1000 SLC

Change on year

up 0.0%

World rank

3rd

of 19 countries

All-time high

2.90 million 1000 SLC

in 2015

All-time low

1.04 million 1000 SLC

in 1981

Years of data

1961–2024

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Cambodia, 1961–2024

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.

Analysis

Cambodia recorded 2.88 million 1000 SLC for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in 2024.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Cambodia peaked at 2.90 million 1000 SLC in 2015 and was at its lowest, 1.04 million 1000 SLC, in 1981.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Cambodia, year by year

Annual values for Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) in Cambodia, 1961 to 2024.
Year	1000 SLC	Change
1961	2.49 million 1000 SLC	—
1962	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1963	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1964	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1965	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1966	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1967	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1968	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1969	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1970	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1971	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1972	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1973	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1974	2.49 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1975	2.38 million 1000 SLC	-4.2%
1976	2.07 million 1000 SLC	-13.0%
1977	1.97 million 1000 SLC	-5.0%
1978	1.55 million 1000 SLC	-21.1%
1979	1.35 million 1000 SLC	-13.3%
1980	1.24 million 1000 SLC	-7.7%
1981	1.04 million 1000 SLC	-16.7%
1982	1.24 million 1000 SLC	+20.0%
1983	1.35 million 1000 SLC	+8.3%
1984	1.45 million 1000 SLC	+7.7%
1985	1.66 million 1000 SLC	+14.3%
1986	1.66 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
1987	1.61 million 1000 SLC	-3.1%
1988	1.66 million 1000 SLC	+3.2%
1989	1.71 million 1000 SLC	+3.1%
1990	1.76 million 1000 SLC	+3.0%
1991	1.81 million 1000 SLC	+2.9%
1992	1.86 million 1000 SLC	+2.9%
1993	1.92 million 1000 SLC	+2.8%
1994	1.97 million 1000 SLC	+2.7%
1995	2.02 million 1000 SLC	+2.6%
1996	1.97 million 1000 SLC	-2.6%
1997	2.07 million 1000 SLC	+5.3%
1998	2.28 million 1000 SLC	+10.0%
1999	2.59 million 1000 SLC	+13.6%
2000	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+11.1%
2001	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2002	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2003	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2004	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2005	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2006	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2007	2.88 million 1000 SLC	-0.1%
2008	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.1%
2009	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2010	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2011	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2012	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2013	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2014	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2015	2.90 million 1000 SLC	+0.9%
2016	2.90 million 1000 SLC	-0.2%
2017	2.90 million 1000 SLC	-0.1%
2018	2.90 million 1000 SLC	+0.1%
2019	2.90 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2020	2.90 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%
2021	2.90 million 1000 SLC	-0.0%
2022	2.89 million 1000 SLC	-0.4%
2023	2.88 million 1000 SLC	-0.3%
2024	2.88 million 1000 SLC	+0.0%

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
1960s	2.49 million 1000 SLC	2.49 million 1000 SLC	2.49 million 1000 SLC	9
1970s	2.18 million 1000 SLC	1.35 million 1000 SLC	2.49 million 1000 SLC	10
1980s	1.46 million 1000 SLC	1.04 million 1000 SLC	1.71 million 1000 SLC	10
1990s	2.03 million 1000 SLC	1.76 million 1000 SLC	2.59 million 1000 SLC	10
2000s	2.88 million 1000 SLC	2.88 million 1000 SLC	2.88 million 1000 SLC	10
2010s	2.89 million 1000 SLC	2.88 million 1000 SLC	2.90 million 1000 SLC	10
2020s	2.89 million 1000 SLC	2.88 million 1000 SLC	2.90 million 1000 SLC	5

Countries ranked near Cambodia

1 India 60.56 million 1000 SLC compare
2 China, mainland 5.83 million 1000 SLC compare
4 Lebanon 1.41 million 1000 SLC compare
5 Afghanistan 425,243 1000 SLC compare
6 Romania 339,295 1000 SLC compare

See the full ranking of 22 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Cambodia

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 7.49 % change on previous year (2025)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1611 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 462.77 current US$ per person (2025)
Rural population, annual growth rate 0.7882 % change on previous year (2025)
Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Rural population, per capita 0.5889 units per person (2025)
Agriculture share gdp 16.11 (2025)
Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 16.11 (2025)
Agricultural raw materials exports 2.6% (2024)
Agricultural raw materials imports 3.0% (2024)

All data for Cambodia →

Frequently asked questions

What is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Cambodia?: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Cambodia was 2.88 million 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value recorded in Cambodia?: The highest recorded value was 2.90 million 1000 SLC in 2015.
What is the lowest silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value recorded in Cambodia?: The lowest recorded value was 1.04 million 1000 SLC in 1981.
How does Cambodia rank for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value?: Cambodia ranks 3rd out of 19 countries with data for 2024.
Is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value rising or falling in Cambodia?: Over the last ten years it is up 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Cambodia data come from?: The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Cambodia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-2/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-2/cambodia/">Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Cambodia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)
Unit: 1000 SLC
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 22 places, 1,164 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 August 2026

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.