SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value in Belarus
Belarus: SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value was 7.25 % in 2023. ▼ Falling
SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value in Belarus, 2001–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2023, sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value in Belarus stood at 7.25 %.
The figure is down 9.8% on the previous year and up 6.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value in Belarus peaked at 10.1 % in 2001 and was at its lowest, 6.28 %, in 2015.
That places Belarus 82nd out of 178 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 23 years of available data.
SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value in Belarus, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 10.1 % | — |
| 2002 | 9.77 % | -3.3% |
| 2003 | 8.28 % | -15.3% |
| 2004 | 8.45 % | +2.1% |
| 2005 | 8.27 % | -2.1% |
| 2006 | 8.33 % | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 8.06 % | -3.2% |
| 2008 | 8.42 % | +4.5% |
| 2009 | 8.13 % | -3.4% |
| 2010 | 8.89 % | +9.3% |
| 2011 | 8 % | -10.0% |
| 2012 | 8.13 % | +1.6% |
| 2013 | 6.81 % | -16.2% |
| 2014 | 7.3 % | +7.2% |
| 2015 | 6.28 % | -14.0% |
| 2016 | 6.9 % | +9.9% |
| 2017 | 7.57 % | +9.7% |
| 2018 | 6.59 % | -12.9% |
| 2019 | 6.79 % | +3.0% |
| 2020 | 7.08 % | +4.3% |
| 2021 | 6.71 % | -5.2% |
| 2022 | 8.04 % | +19.8% |
| 2023 | 7.25 % | -9.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.65 % | 8.06 % | 10.1 % | 9 |
| 2010s | 7.33 % | 6.28 % | 8.89 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.27 % | 6.71 % | 8.04 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 709.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2051 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value in Belarus?
- Sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value in Belarus was 7.25 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 10.1 % in 2001.
- What is the lowest sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 6.28 % in 2015.
- How does Belarus rank for sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value?
- Belarus ranks 82nd out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value added share of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.