Rubber — Other uses in Lithuania
Lithuania: Rubber — Other uses was 175 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Rubber — Other uses in Lithuania, 1992–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, rubber — other uses in Lithuania stood at 175 t.
That represents a change of up 280.4% on the previous year and down 34.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rubber — other uses in Lithuania peaked at 269 t in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1993.
That places Lithuania 91st out of 151 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rubber — Other uses in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 220 t | — |
| 1993 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1994 | 0 t | — |
| 1995 | 62 t | — |
| 1996 | 12 t | -80.6% |
| 1997 | 35 t | +191.7% |
| 1998 | 62 t | +77.1% |
| 1999 | 230 t | +271.0% |
| 2000 | 7 t | -97.0% |
| 2001 | 10 t | +42.9% |
| 2002 | 77 t | +670.0% |
| 2003 | 269 t | +249.4% |
| 2004 | 57 t | -78.8% |
| 2005 | 19 t | -66.7% |
| 2006 | 82 t | +331.6% |
| 2007 | 124 t | +51.2% |
| 2008 | 110 t | -11.3% |
| 2009 | 69 t | -37.3% |
| 2010 | 38 t | -44.9% |
| 2011 | 33 t | -13.2% |
| 2012 | 46 t | +39.4% |
| 2013 | 175 t | +280.4% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 175 t is below the median for high income countries, which is 2,528 t, 7% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 175 t is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1,860 t, 9% of the median. (40 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.62 t | 0 t | 230 t | 8 |
| 2000s | 82.4 t | 7 t | 269 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 73 t | 33 t | 175 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More agriculture & rural data for Lithuania
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 4.69 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0227 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 748.66 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.7947 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3092 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rubber — other uses in Lithuania?
- Rubber — other uses in Lithuania was 175 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest rubber — other uses recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 269 t in 2003.
- What is the lowest rubber — other uses recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1993.
- How does Lithuania rank for rubber — other uses?
- Lithuania ranks 91st out of 151 countries with data for 2013.
- Is rubber — other uses rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Rubber — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.